Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38451339›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024

Lateral-PLIF for spinal arthrodesis: concept, technique, results, complications, and outcomes.

Gabriele Capo, Francesco Calvanese, Alberto Vandenbulcke, Ismail Zaed, Davide Tiziano Di Carlo, Roberta Cao, Cédric Y Barrey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriele CapoDepartment of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 696777, Lyon-Bron, France.
Francesco CalvaneseDepartment of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 696777, Lyon-Bron, France. dr.fcalvanese@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0966-2487
Alberto VandenbulckeDepartment of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 696777, Lyon-Bron, France.
Ismail ZaedDepartment of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 696777, Lyon-Bron, France.
Davide Tiziano Di CarloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP), Via Paradisa 2, 56100, Pisa, Italy.
Roberta CaoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, GHE, Hospices Civils de Lyon, and Claude Bernard University of Lyon 1, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 696777, Lyon-Bron, France.
Cédric Y BarreyDepartment of Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery, Pierre Wertheimer Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 696777, Lyon-Bron, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRParisTech · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery represents an effective option to treat degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine. To reduce the drawbacks of the classical technique, we developed a variant, so-called Lateral-PLIF, which we then evaluated through a prospective consecutive series of patients.

methodsAll adult patients treated at our institute with single or double level Lateral-PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease from January to December 2017 were prospectively collected. Exclusion criteria were patients < 18 years of age, traumatic patients, active infection, or malignancy, as well as unavailability of clinical and/or radiological follow-up data. The technique consists of insert the cages bilaterally through the transition zone between the central canal and the intervertebral foramen, just above the lateral recess. Pre- and postoperative (2 years) questionnaires and phone interviews (4 years) assessed pain and functional outcomes. Data related to the surgical procedure, postoperative complications, and radiological findings (1 year) were collected.

resultsOne hundred four patients were selected for the final analysis. The median age was 58 years and primary symptoms were mechanical back pain (100, 96.1%) and/or radicular pain (73, 70.2%). We found a high fusion rate (95%). A statistically significant improvement in functional outcome was also noted (ODI p < 0.001, Roland-Morris score p < 0.001). Walking distance increased from 812 m ± 543 m to 3443 m ± 712 m (p < 0.001). Complications included dural tear (6.7%), infection/wound dehiscence (4.8%), and instrument failure (1.9%) but no neurological deterioration.

conclusionsLateral-PLIF is a safe and effective technique for lumbar interbody fusion and may be considered for further comparative study validation with other techniques before extensive use to treat lumbar degenerative disease.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionAdultHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionMiddle AgedPainPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesArthrodesisCircumferential fixationInterbody lumbar fusionLateral-PLIFNeurosurgerySpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID38451339
OpenAlexW4392553612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.