Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38451322›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Cine-cardiac magnetic resonance to distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies: a machine learning approach.

Riccardo Cau, Francesco Pisu, Alessandra Pintus, Vitanio Palmisano, Roberta Montisci, Jasjit S Suri, Rodrigo Salgado, Luca Saba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Riccardo CauDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), di Cagliari - Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554 Monserrato, 09045, Cagliari, Italy.
Francesco PisuDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), di Cagliari - Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554 Monserrato, 09045, Cagliari, Italy.
Alessandra PintusDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), di Cagliari - Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554 Monserrato, 09045, Cagliari, Italy.
Vitanio PalmisanoOspedale General Regionale F. Miulli, Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Italy.
Roberta MontisciDepartment of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), di Cagliari - Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554 Monserrato, 09045, Cagliari, Italy.
Jasjit S SuriStroke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA, USA.
Rodrigo SalgadoUniversitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Edegem, Belgium.
Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (A.O.U.), di Cagliari - Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554 Monserrato, 09045, Cagliari, Italy. lucasaba@tiscali.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2870-3771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis work aimed to derive a machine learning (ML) model for the differentiation between ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) on non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated CMR scans of 107 consecutive patients (49 ICM, 58 NICM), including atrial and ventricular strain parameters. We used these data to compare an explainable tree-based gradient boosting additive model with four traditional ML models for the differentiation of ICM and NICM. The models were trained and internally validated with repeated cross-validation according to discrimination and calibration. Furthermore, we examined important variables for distinguishing between ICM and NICM.

resultsA total of 107 patients and 38 variables were available for the analysis. Of those, 49 were ICM (34 males, mean age 60 ± 9 years) and 58 patients were NICM (38 males, mean age 56 ± 19 years). After 10 repetitions of the tenfold cross-validation, the proposed model achieved the highest area under curve (0.82, 95% CI [0.47-1.00]) and lowest Brier score (0.19, 95% CI [0.13-0.27]), showing competitive diagnostic accuracy and calibration. At the Youden's index, sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI [0.68-0.76]), the highest of all. Analysis of predictions revealed that both atrial and ventricular strain CMR parameters were important for the identification of ICM patients.

conclusionThe current study demonstrated that using a ML model, multi chamber myocardial strain, and function on non-contrast CMR parameters enables the discrimination between ICM and NICM with competitive diagnostic accuracy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A machine learning model based on non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters may discriminate between ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy enabling wider access to cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations with lower costs and faster imaging acquisition. KEY POINTS: • The exponential growth in cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations may require faster and more cost-effective protocols. • Artificial intelligence models can be utilized to distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic etiologies. • Machine learning using non-contrast CMR parameters can effectively distinguish between ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial IschemiaAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceCardiomyopathyCardiovascular diseasesCine magnetic resonance imagingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38451322
PMCPMC11364683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.