Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38451288›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Primary biliary cholangitis-response criteria of first-line treatment and perspectives of second-line therapy].

Silja Steinmann, Christoph Schramm

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silja SteinmannZentrum für Innere Medizin, I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Gastroenterologie, Sektionen Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. si.steinmann@uke.de.
Christoph SchrammZentrum für Innere Medizin, I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik (Gastroenterologie, Sektionen Infektiologie und Tropenmedizin), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. c.schramm@uke.de.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that can progress to liver cirrhosis if left untreated. Early diagnosis, initiation of therapy and, if necessary, adjustment of treatment are essential to prevent disease progression. The timing and thresholds for assessing adequate treatment response are inconsistently defined in the literature and can pose a challenge in clinical practice.

objectiveIn addition to providing a concise overview of the guideline-based diagnostic work-up and first-line therapy, this study offers practical guidance for the evaluation of treatment response and options for second-line treatment in PBC. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis article is based on the current European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) clinical practice guidelines for the management of PBC from 2017 as well as a literature review of studies from 2017 to 2023, focusing on defining treatment response, assessing disease progression risk, and the approved and investigational agents for second-line therapy.

resultsThere are varying definitions for a sufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Therapeutic goals are tailored to the individual risk of disease progression. The lowest risk appears to be associated with normalization of alkaline phosphatase (AP) and serum bilirubin below 0.6 the upper limit of normal. Established second-line therapies include obeticholic acid and bezafibrate (off-label use), while other peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists and combination therapies are under clinical investigation. DISCUSSION: Early evaluation of treatment response to UDCA is mandatory. In the case of insufficient treatment response, second-line therapy should be initiated according to the individual's risk profile.

Indexed as

CholestasisLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryCombined Modality TherapyDisease ProgressionHumansUrsodeoxycholic AcidUrsodeoxycholic AcidAlkaline phosphataseObeticholic acidPrimary biliary Cholangitis/disease progressionTreatment responseUrsodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID38451288
OpenAlexW4392545430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.