Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450998›Full record

Observational studyBrain and behavior2024

The non-paretic-hand-to-opposite-ear test: A simple test to detect aphasia and neglect and an indicator of large anterior vessel occlusion in patients with suspected acute stroke.

Matthias L Herrmann, Clara Franck, Florian F Schuchardt, Simone Meier, Max Henningsen, Nicole Wimmesberger, Diana Rau, Hans-Jörg Busch, Christian A Taschner, Erik Farin-Glattacker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias L HerrmannDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-8506
Clara FranckSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research (SEVERA), Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Florian F SchuchardtDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Simone MeierDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Max HenningsenDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Nicole WimmesbergerSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research (SEVERA), Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Diana RauSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research (SEVERA), Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans-Jörg BuschDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christian A TaschnerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Erik Farin-GlattackerSection of Health Care Research and Rehabilitation Research (SEVERA), Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jochen BrichDepartment of Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-1892
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01VSF19053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAphasia and neglect in combination with hemiparesis are reliable indicators of large anterior vessel occlusion (LAVO). Prehospital identification of these symptoms is generally considered difficult by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel. Therefore, we evaluated the simple non-paretic-hand-to-opposite-ear (NPE) test to identify aphasia and neglect with a single test. As the NPE test includes a test for arm paresis, we also evaluated the diagnostic ability of the NPE test to detect LAVO in patients with suspected stroke.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, we performed the NPE test in 1042 patients with suspected acute stroke between May 2021 and May 2022. We analyzed the correlation between the NPE test and the aphasia/neglect items of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Additionally, the predictive values of the NPE test for LAVO detection were calculated.

resultsThe NPE test showed a strong, significant correlation with both aphasia and neglect. A positive NPE test result predicted LAVO with a sensitivity of 0.70, a specificity of 0.88, and an accuracy of 0.85. Logistic regression analysis showed an odds ratio of 16.14 (95% confidence interval 10.82-24.44) for predicting LAVO.

conclusionThe NPE test is a simple test for the detection of both aphasia and neglect. With its predictive values for LAVO detection being comparable to the results of LAVO scores in the prehospital setting, this simple test might be a promising test for prehospital LAVO detection by EMS personnel. Further prospective prehospital validation is needed.

Indexed as

AphasiaEmergency Medical ServicesStrokeHandHumansOdds RatioUnited Statesaphasialarge vessel occlusionneglectparamedicstroke

Identifiers

PMID38450998
PMCPMC10918592
OpenAlexW4392553348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.