ArticleJournal of proteome research2024
Comparison of N-Glycopeptide to Released N-Glycan Abundances and the Influence of Glycopeptide Mass and Charge States on N-Linked Glycosylation of IgG Antibodies.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- GlycoViz: a glycoproteomics tool for validating and visualizing glycopeptide identifications.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of TIMS-derived peptide mobility measurements: calibration strategy and MS1/MS2 discrepancies.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Site-Specific Glycosylation Profiling of Protein Subunit and Inactivated Virus Vaccines.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Application of Post-Glycosylation Modifying Enzymes for Mass Spectrometry Imaging of ModifiedJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Tailoring isomeric transformations and surface adsorption dynamics of glycopeptides under thermal and photolytic stress.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A Multi-Laboratory, Multi-Platform Analysis of the Multi-Attribute Method.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We report the comparison of mass-spectral-based abundances of tryptic glycopeptides to fluorescence abundances of released labeled glycans and the effects of mass and charge state and in-source fragmentation on glycopeptide abundances. The primary glycoforms derived from Rituximab, NISTmAb, Evolocumab, and Infliximab were high-mannose and biantennary complex galactosylated and fucosylated N-glycans. Except for Evolocumab, in-source ions derived from the loss of HexNAc or HexNAc-Hex sugars are prominent for other therapeutic IgGs. After excluding in-source fragmentation of glycopeptide ions from the results, a linear correlation was observed between fluorescently labeled N-glycan and glycopeptide abundances over a dynamic range of 500. Different charge states of human IgG-derived glycopeptides containing a wider variety of abundant attached glycans were also investigated to examine the effects of the charge state on ion abundances. These revealed a linear dependence of glycopeptide abundance on the mass of the glycan with higher charge states favoring higher-mass glycans. Findings indicate that the mass spectrometry-based bottom-up approach can provide results as accurate as those of glycan release studies while revealing the origin of each attached glycan. These site-specific relative abundances are conveniently displayed and compared using previously described glycopeptide abundance distribution spectra "GADS" representations. Mass spectrometry data are available from the MAssIVE repository (MSV000093562).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.