Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450589›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2024

Long-term catheter management in the community: a population-based analysis of user characteristics, service utilisation and costs in England.

Heather Gage, Peter Williams, Miriam Avery, Catherine Murphy, Mandy Fader

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather GageSurrey Health Economics Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Economics, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-9406
Peter WilliamsDepartment of Mathematics and Physicas, University of Surrey, Guildford, England.
Miriam AveryContinence Technology and Skin Health Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
Catherine MurphyBladder and Bowel Management Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-5106
Mandy FaderBladder and Bowel Management Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-543X
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBSKiN Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term urinary catheters are problematic and burdensome for patients, carers and health services. Nursing practice to improve the management of long-term urinary catheters has been held back by a lack of evidence to support policy and practice. Little is known about who uses a catheter long term and the resources and costs needed for their management. Understanding these costs will help to target innovations to improve care. There have been no substantial innovations to urinary catheters or their management recently and no publications to characterise users and costs.

aimTo describe long-term catheter users and explore catheter-related service use and costs in England.

methodsDescriptive information on the characteristics of catheter users and their use of services was obtained from: General Practice records (

findingsMost catheter users (59.6%) were men, nearly three-quarters (71.2%) were over 70 years and 60.8% used a urethral catheter. Women tended to be younger than men and more likely to use a suprapubic catheter. The services used most frequently over 12 months were general practitioner (by 63.1%) and out of hours services (43.0%); 15.5% accessed Accident and Emergency services for urgent catheter-related care. Hospital use accounted for nearly half (48.9%) of total health service costs (mainly due to inpatient stays by 13.6% of participants); catheter supplies/medications were next most costly (25.7%). Half of all costs were accounted for by 14.2% of users. The median annual cost of services used was £6.38, IQR: £344-£1324; district nursing services added approximately a further £200 per annum.

conclusionsFinding better ways to reduce catheter problems (e.g. blockage, infection) that cause unplanned visits, urgent or hospital care should be a priority to improve quality of life for long-term catheter users and reduce health service expenditure.

Indexed as

Health ServicesQuality of LifeCathetersEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMalecommunity costslong-term catheter usersmanagement

Identifiers

PMID38450589
PMCPMC10940055
OpenAlexW4392566082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.