Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450566›Full record

ReviewHuman gene therapy2024

Role of FoxP3

Maite Muñoz-Melero, Moanaro Biswas

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human gene therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The curious case of AAV immunology.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maite Muñoz-MeleroHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Moanaro BiswasHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2889-5905
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Development of a cellular therapy product with single specificity and improved persistence to prevent immunity to biotherapeuticsR21HL170146 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BISWAS, MOANARO · 2023 to 2024
$452k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL170146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy is making rapid strides owing to its wide range of therapeutic applications. However, development of serious immune responses to the capsid antigen or the therapeutic transgene product hinders its full clinical impact. Immune suppressive (IS) drug treatments have been used in various clinical trials to prevent the deleterious effects of cytotoxic T cells to the viral vector or transgene, although there is no consensus on the best treatment regimen, dosage, or schedule. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are crucial for maintaining tolerance against self or nonself antigens. Of importance, Tregs also play an important role in dampening immune responses to AAV gene therapy, including tolerance induction to the transgene product. Approaches to harness the tolerogenic effect of Tregs include the use of selective IS drugs that expand existing Tregs, and skew activated conventional T cells into antigen-specific peripherally induced Tregs. In addition, Tregs can be expanded

Indexed as

DependovirusForkhead Transcription FactorsGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAnimalsHumansImmune ToleranceTransgenesForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, humanAAVCARIL-2immune suppressionregulatory T cellsTregs

Identifiers

PMID38450566
PMCPMC11302314
OpenAlexW4392561049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.