ArticleHaematologica2024
Impact and utility of follicular lymphoma GELF criteria in routine care: an Australasian Lymphoma Alliance study.
Article in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- LTB-TREAT: A validated international prognostic model for time to treatment in low tumour burden follicular lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Consensus recommendations from the 2024 International Follicular Lymphoma Scientific Workshop.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Segmentation method comparison for baseline [EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- FLIPI24: A Modern Prognostic Model and Clinical Trial Enrichment Tool for Newly Diagnosed Follicular Lymphoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Article
- Personalizing Maintenance Rituximab in Follicular Lymphoma: A Machine Learning Framework for Risk-Benefit Optimization.Health data science · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a gene expression signature to predict early events in patients with follicular lymphoma.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Article
- Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Current Advances and Emerging Perspectives.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- In pursuit of a functional cure for follicular lymphoma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024Review
- Follicular lymphoma treatment decisions: put GELF on the shelf?Haematologica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) treatment initiation is largely determined by tumor burden and symptoms. In the pre-rituximab era, the Group d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) developed widely adopted criteria to identify high tumor burden FL patients to harmonize clinical trial populations. The utilization of GELF criteria (GELFc) in routine therapeutic decision- making is poorly described. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patterns of GELFc at presentation and GELFc utilization in therapeutic decision-making in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage rituximab-era FL. Associations between GELFc, treatment given, and patient survival were analyzed in 300 eligible cases identified between 2002-2019. One hundred and sixty-three (54%) had ≥1 GELFc at diagnosis. The presence or cumulative number of GELFc did not predict progression-free survival in patients undergoing watch-and-wait (W&W) or those receiving systemic treatment. Of interest, in patients with ≥1 GELFc, 16 of 163 (10%) underwent initial W&W (comprising 22% of the W&W cohort). In those receiving systemic therapy +/- radiotherapy, 74 of 215 (34%) met no GELFc. Our data suggest clinicians are using adjunctive measures to make decisions regarding treatment initiation in a significant proportion of patients. By restricting FL clinical trial eligibility only to those meeting GELFc, reported outcomes may not be applicable to a significant proportion of patients treated in routine care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.