Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450372›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

A novel hybrid machine learning model for auxiliary diagnosing myocardial ischemia.

Jing Wang, Jing Xu, Jingsong Mao, Suzhong Fu, Haowei Gu, Naiming Wu, Guoqing Su, Zhiping Lin, Kaiyue Zhang, Yuetong Lin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jing Wang *Department of Imaging, School of Medicine, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jing Xu *State Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jingsong Mao *Department of Vascular Intervention, Affiliated Hospital, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Suzhong FuState Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Haowei GuState Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Naiming WuDepartment of Imaging, School of Medicine, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Guoqing SuDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Zhiping LinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Guangzhou, China.
Kaiyue ZhangState Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yuetong LinState Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Yang ZhaoDepartment of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Gang LiuState Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Hengyu ZhaoDepartment of Imaging, School of Medicine, Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qingliang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Vaccines for Infectious Diseases, Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, Xiang An Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Public Health, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate identification of the myocardial texture features of fat around the coronary artery on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) images are crucial to improve clinical diagnostic efficiency of myocardial ischemia (MI). However, current coronary CT examination is difficult to recognize and segment the MI characteristics accurately during earlier period of inflammation. Materials and methods: We proposed a random forest model to automatically segment myocardium and extract peripheral fat features. This hybrid machine learning (HML) model is integrated by CCTA images and clinical data. A total of 1,316 radiomics features were extracted from CCTA images. To further obtain the features that contribute the most to the diagnostic model, dimensionality reduction was applied to filter features to three: LNS, GFE, and WLGM. Moreover, statistical hypothesis tests were applied to improve the ability of discriminating and screening clinical features between the ischemic and non-ischemic groups. Results: By comparing the accuracy, recall, specificity and AUC of the three models, it can be found that HML had the best performance, with the value of 0.848, 0.762, 0.704 and 0.729. Conclusion: In sum, this study demonstrates that ML-based radiomics model showed good predictive value in MI, and offer an enhanced tool for predicting prognosis with greater accuracy.

Indexed as

coronary atherosclerosiscoronary CT angiographymedical image analysisradiomicsrandom forest model

Identifiers

PMID38450372
PMCPMC10914931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.