Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450369›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

High intensity interval training vs. moderate intensity continuous training on aerobic capacity and functional capacity in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Changran Yang, Lizhuang Zhang, Yu Cheng, Manman Zhang, Yuxin Zhao, Tianzi Zhang, Jiawang Dong, Jun Xing, Yuzhi Zhen, Cuihua Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Changran YangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Lizhuang ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yu ChengDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Manman ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuxin ZhaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Tianzi ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jiawang DongDepartment of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jun Xing *Department of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuzhi Zhen *Department of Cardiology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Cuihua Wang *Department of Rehabilitation, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Exercise training is commonly employed as a efficacious supplementary treatment for individuals suffering from heart failure, but the optimal exercise regimen is still controversial. The objective of the review was to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on the exercise capacity, cardiac function, quality of life (QoL) and heart rate among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods: A systematic search was performed using the following eight databases from their inception to July 5, 2023: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, China Knowledge Network, Wan fang Data, and the China Biology Medicine databases. The meta-analysis results were presented as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials were included in the study. The results showed that HIIT had a significant positive effect on peak oxygen uptake (MD = 1.78, 95% CI for 0.80-2.76), left ventricular ejection fraction (MD = 3.13, 95% CI for 1.25-5.02), six-minute walk test (MD = 28.13, 95% CI for 14.56-41.70), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MD = -4.45, 95% CI for -6.25 to -2.64) compared to MICT. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in resting heart rate and peak heart rate. Conclusions: HIIT significantly improves peak oxygen uptake, left ventricular ejection fraction, six-minute walk test, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Additionally, HIIT exhibits greater effectiveness in improving peak oxygen uptake among patients with lower body mass index. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.7.0100, identifier (INPLASY2023.7.0100).

Indexed as

exercise capacityfunctional capacityheart failure with reduced ejection fractionhigh-intensity interval trainingmoderate-intensity continuous training

Identifiers

PMID38450369
PMCPMC10915068
OpenAlexW4392002112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.