Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450263›Full record

ReviewNarra J2023

Challenges and adversities among doctors in the era of healthcare disruption: Reflection from COVID-19 pandemic.

Tri A Sugiyatmi, Usman Hadi, Djazuly Chalidyanto, Yashwant Pathak, Muhammad Miftahussurur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Narra J, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tri A SugiyatmiFaculty of Health Science, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Tarakan, Indonesia.
Usman HadiDivision of Tropical-Infection Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine - Dr. Soetomo Academic Teaching Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Djazuly ChalidyantoFaculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Yashwant PathakTaneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Muhammad MiftahussururDivision of Gastroentero-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine - Dr. Soetomo Academic Teaching Hospital, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The doctor's profession is noble and tied up with quite strict rules, both in terms of ethics as well as discipline. Naturally, there is a problem of asymmetrical information between doctors and patients, often leading to misunderstandings. The purpose of this review is to map the available evidence related to the challenges and difficulties faced by doctors in the era of disruption. The evidence indicate that disruption of health services has both positive and negative effects. Many aspects related to the use of technology in the medical practices including innovation, cost-effectiveness, and quality improvement. However, psychologically, the doctors often get frustrated by internal or external triggers. The external factors, ranges from the equipment and work procedures, for instance, using high technology, communication with management, inter-professional relationships, patients, and their families. Volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) could cause stress and burnout. In this case, doctors are highly vulnerable, and consequently, have the potential to make mistakes. Therefore, the adversity faced by doctors ought to be mapped. Resilience is a barrier against stress and burnout and the ability to adapt in resilience among doctors is important factor in dealing with the disruption era.

Indexed as

Adversityburnoutchallengehealthcare disruptionresilience

Identifiers

PMID38450263
PMCPMC10916102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.