Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38450243›Full record

ReviewHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2024

Prevalence of diabetes distress among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ratnesh Sinha, Angelin Priya, Anuvi Sinha, Mohammad Hifz Ur Rahman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Expert Opinion on Optimizing Suboptimal Basal Insulin Titration in India: Addressing Challenges and Leveraging Digital Solutions.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ratnesh SinhaManipal Tata Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-5952
Angelin PriyaManipal Tata Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-8354
Anuvi SinhaSadar Hospital, Ranchi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9355-5073
Mohammad Hifz Ur RahmanManipal Tata Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0039-5837

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India is on the rise, with projections indicating a staggering 134 million cases by 2045. Managing T2DM demands strict adherence, often resulting in mental strain and burnout. Diabetes distress (DD), a unique psychological burden, significantly affects motivation and self-care, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Material and Methods: This study was conducted by doing a comprehensive literature search using PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE databases for studies published from their inception to 14th August 2023 by using relevant keywords. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO and adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Selected articles were meticulously screened based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal scale for cross-sectional study was used for assessing the study quality. Data analysis was done by using Jamovi 2.3.24 software. Results: Following the systematic search and screening process, 10 cross-sectional studies were identified, comprising a total of 2,107 Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients. All studies employed the Diabetes Distress Scale-17 (DDS-17) for measurement. The prevalence of DD varied, ranging from 8.45% to 61.48%. The pooled prevalence of DD in T2DM patients in India was estimated at 33% (95% CI: 21%-45%) with substantial heterogeneity observed ( Conclusion: Policymakers, clinicians, and researchers can leverage these insights to prioritize the psychological well-being of T2DM patients, ultimately improving their overall health outcomes. This study aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and India's national health policy, emphasizing the urgency of screening and treating diabetes-related distress by 2025.

Indexed as

Diabetes distressIndiameta-analysisprevalencesystematic reviewT2DMtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID38450243
PMCPMC10916906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.