ArticleCureus2024
A Multicentric Audit to Reevaluate the Guidelines Adherence in Computed Tomography of Kidneys, Ureters, and Bladder (CT-KUB) X-ray Imaging in Jordan.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping the Landscape of Over-Scanning in CT Imaging: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background With the increasing use of imaging techniques involving ionizing radiation, the area of the body scanned should be restricted to what is required to answer the clinical question. Therefore, this is a retrospective audit that intends to evaluate the presence of overscanning in renal computed tomography (CT) scan images during the process of evaluation for urinary symptoms. Objective This study aims to reduce the unnecessary scan length and exposure to radiation in patients who undergo CT scans for urinary symptoms. Materials and Methods In two months duration, patients from different clinics underwent CT imaging, and the resulting radiographic images were collected and analyzed. Overscanning was defined to be more than 10% of the total scan. Subsequently, the total length of the CT scan was measured which is used to measure the unnecessary overscan above the highest kidney margin as a percentage of the total length. Results Out of the 88 patients who were evaluated, 100% did not meet the guidelines for renal CT imaging and were exposed to a high radiation dose. However, the minimum percentage of overscanned patients was 20-40%. Conclusion A significant number of scans demonstrated surplus overscanning above the highest kidney. Therefore, recognizing the suitable anatomical landmarks for scanning and establishing a follow-up audit are suggested measures to minimize the noxious effects of radiation exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.