ArticleCureus2024
Autologous Protein Solution (APS) and Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Scoping Review of Current Clinical Evidence.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous protein solution and 3D-Printed technologies as potential adjuncts to arthroscopic elbow release: a narrative review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Article
- Pathological Site Pain During Injections as a Predictive Sign for Clinical Response in Autologous Protein Solution and Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Shoulder Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Autologous Growth Factor-Rich Concentrate (GFC) Injection in Non-union of Fractures: A Quasi-experimental Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Platelet Lysate and Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence.Pain and therapy · 2024Review
- Gold-Induced Cytokine (GOLDIC) for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Growth Factor Concentrate (GFC) for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Review
- Editorial: Regenerative biologics for musculoskeletal injuries.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knees are the most regularly affected weight-bearing joints in osteoarthritis (OA), impacting millions of individuals across the globe. The incidence of knee OA will further rise with increasing rates of obesity and lifespan, resulting in a significant increase in the worldwide socioeconomic burden. Conventional therapies used to manage the symptoms associated with knee OA have limitations. Lately, there has been an increased interest in the use of autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBO), including autologous protein solution (APS), for the management of knee OA. Here, the primary objective is to summarize the outcomes of clinical studies involving APS for the treatment of knee OA. Several databases (Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched using terms for the intervention "APS" and treatment "knee OA" for articles published in English until January 21, 2024. All clinical studies using APS as an intervention for the treatment of knee OA were included. Studies not utilizing APS alone or not aiming at the management of knee OA were excluded. Six clinical studies that met our predefined search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The results demonstrated that the intra-articular administration of APS is safe and efficacious in reducing pain and/or improving function in patients suffering from knee OA. However, more multicenter, randomized controlled trials involving active comparators, with adequate power and long-term follow-up along with post-market real-world studies in clinical practice are required to further assess the efficacy of APS and justify its regular clinical use for the management of knee OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.