ReviewCureus2024
A Systematic Review of the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis by Proximal Fibular Osteotomy in the Indian Population.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to assess the management of knee osteoarthritis through proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) in the Indian population by synthesizing data from various prospective cohort and interventional studies. We seek to provide an overview of the effectiveness and safety of PFO as a treatment modality and offer insights into its potential implications for clinical practice in India. A systematic search strategy was employed, targeting multiple medical databases to identify relevant studies published from 2018 to 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving Indian patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis and varus deformity who underwent PFO. Data were extracted and evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Eight studies were included in this review, each displaying varying designs, patient populations, and follow-up duration. The findings consistently indicated that PFO improved pain, knee function, and radiological outcomes, such as knee joint space and tibio-femoral angles. These improvements were generally sustained over several months to a year. The available evidence underscores the potential of PFO as a promising intervention for managing knee osteoarthritis in the Indian population, particularly in patients with medial compartment involvement and varus deformity. While these results are promising, the limitations inherent in the current literature, including study design variations and small sample sizes, necessitate further research with more extensive and diverse patient populations. This systematic review provides valuable insights for healthcare professionals and researchers, highlighting the need for more rigorous investigations and supporting the consideration of PFO as a viable treatment option for knee osteoarthritis in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.