Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38449922›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Healthcare Provider N95 Respirator Contamination Worn Behind Face Shields With SARS-CoV-2 During Routine Clinical Care of Patients With COVID-19.

Amanda M Graves, Bobby G Warren, Aaron Barrett, Sarah S Lewis, Becky Smith, David J Weber, Emily E Sickbert-Bennett, Deverick J Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda M GravesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-7714
Bobby G WarrenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-0300
Aaron BarrettDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah S LewisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Becky SmithDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David J WeberDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Emily E Sickbert-BennettDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Deverick J AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS U54CK000483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N95 respirator contamination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during clinical care of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 is poorly understood. We performed a prospective observational study on healthcare provider's (HCP's) N95 respirators' and face shields' SARS-CoV-2 contamination during aerosol-generating procedures on SARS-CoV-2-positive patients housed in a COVID-19-specific unit. Medical masks worn on top of HCP's N95 respirators, and under face shields, during study aerosol-generating procedures were used as surrogates to detect contamination to avoid waste. Thirty-three HCPs were studied, and a total of 33 mask and 27 face shields were sampled. Masks were cut into 9 pieces and face shields were sampled twice, front and back, to determine locality of contamination; however, no positive samples were identified using standard polymerase chain reaction techniques with a CT value up to 40. All 9 mask piece samples were then pooled, as were face shield samples, using centrifugal concentration with polyethersulfone membranes. Once pooled and concentrated, overall, 9 (15%) samples were positive via real-time polymerase chain reaction: 5 from masks (15.2%) and 4 from face shields (14.8%).

Indexed as

healthcare epidemiologyhospital environmentmask contaminationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38449922
PMCPMC10917086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.