ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2024
Knowledge, attitude, and practice of blood donation: A cross-sectional survey in Khulna city, Bangladesh.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awareness and Willingness of Blood Donation Among Medical Students of Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards blood donation among donors: a cross-sectional study in Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is evidence that the worldwide need for safe blood is not being met, particularly in poor nations like Bangladesh, where there is a scarcity of voluntary blood donors. This research intends to evaluate the public's knowledge, attitude, and practice of voluntary blood donation and the socio-demographic factors associated with blood donation in Khulna city, Bangladesh. Materials and methods: 720 interviews were taken using a structural questionnaire with Khulna city residents implementing the convenience sampling technique. After pre-processing and removing missing values, 697 records were left for further analysis. To investigate the association of sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, education, occupation, marital status, permanent address, and smoking status with knowledge, attitude, and practice of blood donation, the binary logistic regression model was used. Results: According to this research, 478 (68.58%), 654 (93.83%), and 451 (64.71%) respondents were knowledgeable, had a favorable attitude, and practiced VBD, respectively. The study level higher secondary (AOR = 2.2; CI: 1.16-4.18), honors or degree (AOR = 2.37; CI: 1.3-4.3), and masters or above (AOR = 3.27; CI: 1.69-6.35) were associated with the knowledge. The favorable attitude was connected with being male (AOR = 2.24; CI: 1.23-4.06), learning about VBD through online social media (AOR = 2.61; CI: 1.13-6.05), and having knowledge of VBD (AOR = 3.05; CI: 1.82-5.12). Age between 26 and 35 years (AOR = 2.83; CI: 1.43-5.57) and older than 45 years (AOR = 3.74; CI: 1.34-10.4), being a man (AOR = 3.6; CI: 2.25-5.78), being a smoker (AOR = 1.87; CI: 1.17-2.98), knowing about VBD (AOR = 2.31; CI: 1.55-3.42), and having a positive attitude (AOR = 3.78; CI: 2.11-6.77) were significant factors for practicing blood donation. Conclusion: This research demonstrates poor blood donation practices and limited knowledge of blood donation among Khulna city residents. The awareness of the residents should be prolonged for voluntary blood donation by the health bureau, the government, and non-governmental organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.