Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38449751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Scott Bannister, Alinka E Greasley, Trevor J Cox, Michael A Akeroyd, Jon Barker, Bruno Fazenda, Jennifer Firth, Simone N Graetzer, Gerardo Roa Dabike, Rebecca R Vos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Scott BannisterSchool of Music, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Alinka E GreasleySchool of Music, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Trevor J CoxAcoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Michael A AkeroydSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jon BarkerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Bruno FazendaAcoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Jennifer FirthSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Simone N GraetzerAcoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Gerardo Roa DabikeAcoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Rebecca R VosAcoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
William M WhitmerSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Previous work on audio quality evaluation has demonstrated a developing convergence of the key perceptual attributes underlying judgments of quality, such as timbral, spatial and technical attributes. However, across existing research there remains a limited understanding of the crucial perceptual attributes that inform audio quality evaluation for people with hearing loss, and those who use hearing aids. This is especially the case with music, given the unique problems it presents in contrast to human speech. Method: This paper presents a sensory evaluation study utilising descriptive analysis methods, in which a panel of hearing aid users collaborated, through consensus, to identify the most important perceptual attributes of music audio quality and developed a series of rating scales for future listening tests. Participants ( Results: Findings show that there were seven key perceptual dimensions underlying music audio quality ( Discussion: We outline how these perceptual attributes align with extant literature, how attribute rating instruments might be used in future work, and the importance of better understanding the music listening difficulties of people with varied profiles of hearing loss.

Indexed as

audio quality evaluationhearing aidshearing lossmusicperception

Identifiers

PMID38449751
PMCPMC10916511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.