ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Dynamic cerebral blood flow assessment based on electromagnetic coupling sensing and image feature analysis.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bilateral Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Asymptomatic Unilateral Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Arterial Spin Labeling MRI Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Non-invasive bio-electromagnetic monitoring of cerebrovascular function: a novel conductivity reactivity index (CRx) for optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in acute brain injury models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic assessment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is crucial for guiding personalized management and treatment strategies, and improving the prognosis of stroke. However, a safe, reliable, and effective method for dynamic CBF evaluation is currently lacking in clinical practice. In this study, we developed a CBF monitoring system utilizing electromagnetic coupling sensing (ECS). This system detects variations in brain conductivity and dielectric constant by identifying the resonant frequency (RF) in an equivalent circuit containing both magnetic induction and electrical coupling. We evaluated the performance of the system using a self-made physical model of blood vessel pulsation to test pulsatile CBF. Additionally, we recruited 29 healthy volunteers to monitor cerebral oxygen (CO), cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) data and RF data before and after caffeine consumption. We analyzed RF and CBFV trends during immediate responses to abnormal intracranial blood supply, induced by changes in vascular stiffness, and compared them with CO data. Furthermore, we explored a method of dynamically assessing the overall level of CBF by leveraging image feature analysis. Experimental testing substantiates that this system provides a detection range and depth enhanced by three to four times compared to conventional electromagnetic detection techniques, thereby comprehensively covering the principal intracranial blood supply areas. And the system effectively captures CBF responses under different intravascular pressure stimulations. In healthy volunteers, as cerebral vascular stiffness increases and CO decreases due to caffeine intake, the RF pulsation amplitude diminishes progressively. Upon extraction and selection of image features, widely used machine learning algorithms exhibit commendable performance in classifying overall CBF levels. These results highlight that our proposed methodology, predicated on ECS and image feature analysis, enables the capture of immediate responses of abnormal intracranial blood supply triggered by alterations in vascular stiffness. Moreover, it provides an accurate diagnosis of the overall CBF level under varying physiological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.