ArticleHeliyon2024
Boosted dipper throated optimization algorithm-based Xception neural network for skin cancer diagnosis: An optimal approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm enabled DETR (DEtection TRansformer) model for skin disease classification.PloS one · 2025Article
- ArsenicNet: An efficient way of arsenic skin disease detection using enriched fusion Xception model.PloS one · 2025Article
- Anomaly Detection in Embryo Development and Morphology Using Medical Computer Vision-Aided Swin Transformer with Boosted Dipper-Throated Optimization Algorithm.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-07-16Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Duplication of/in Image · Euphemisms for Duplication · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/B9090E7441652FB5AC2B4EBB4434A2
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is a prevalent form of cancer that necessitates prompt and precise detection. However, current diagnostic methods for skin cancer are either invasive, time-consuming, or unreliable. Consequently, there is a demand for an innovative and efficient approach to diagnose skin cancer that utilizes non-invasive and automated techniques. In this study, a unique method has been proposed for diagnosing skin cancer by employing an Xception neural network that has been optimized using Boosted Dipper Throated Optimization (BDTO) algorithm. The Xception neural network is a deep learning model capable of extracting high-level features from skin dermoscopy images, while the BDTO algorithm is a bio-inspired optimization technique that can determine the optimal parameters and weights for the Xception neural network. To enhance the quality and diversity of the images, the ISIC dataset is utilized, a widely accepted benchmark system for skin cancer diagnosis, and various image preprocessing and data augmentation techniques were implemented. By comparing the method with several contemporary approaches, it has been demonstrated that the method outperforms others in detecting skin cancer. The method achieves an average precision of 94.936%, an average accuracy of 94.206%, and an average recall of 97.092% for skin cancer diagnosis, surpassing the performance of alternative methods. Additionally, the 5-fold ROC curve and error curve have been presented for the data validation to showcase the superiority and robustness of the method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.