ArticleHeliyon2024
Microbiology of cystic fibrosis persons not chronically infected with
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The upper airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) persons are an evolutionary niche where genetically adapted bacterial strains are selected for lung infection. The microbiological studies conducted up to now on the upper airways are not easily comparable. Methods: Using classical culture methods, we simultaneously studied the microbiological status of upper and lower airways in persons not chronically infected with Results: A total of 194 persons were enrolled in this study. Pathogenic flora was found in 128 (6.6%) of 194 upper airways samples and in 164 (84.6%) lower airways samples. A statistically significant difference between the upper airways and the lower airways was found in the isolation of Conclusions: In our study population, cultures of the upper airway and lower airway differ in CF persons. In people sampled with nasal lavage according to Mainz more non-fermenter gram negatives were detected than with rhino-set. The two sampling methods were comparable with regard to the caused pain, nasal lavage according to Mainz method being quicker to perform.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.