ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimizing 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses for patients with stroke: Importance of effective elastic modulus and finite element simulation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Assessment of hybrid nanocomposite AFOs for pediatric cerebral palsy: mechanical, spectroscopic, and finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic outcomes of customized 3D-printed ankle-foot orthoses in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a case series study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with stroke often use ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) for gait improvement. 3D printing technology has become a popular tool in recent years for the production of AFOs due to its strengths on customization and rapid manufacturing. However, the porosity of the 3D printed materials affects the kinetic features of these orthoses, leading to its lower-strength than solid ones. The effective elastic modulus of 3D printed material was measured following standard test method to obtain the kinetic features precisely in a finite element simulation. This study demonstrated that the porosity of 3D printed samples using 100% fill density was 11% for PLA and 16% for Nylon. As a result, their effective elastic modulus was reduced to 1/3 and 1/12 of fully solid objects, respectively, leading to a lower stiffness of 3D printed orthoses. A fatigue testing platform was built to verify our finite element model, and the findings of the fatigue test were consistent with the analysis of the finite element model. Further, our AFO has been proven to have a lifespan exceeding 200 thousand steps. Our study highlights the significance of determining the actual porosity of 3D printed samples by calculating the effective elastic modulus, which leads to a more precise finite element simulation and enables reliable prediction of the kinetic features of the AFO. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the production and optimization of 3D printed AFOs for patients with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.