Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38449497›Full record

ReviewRestorative dentistry & endodontics2024

Cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics: from the specific technical considerations of acquisition parameters and interpretation to advanced clinical applications.

Néstor Ríos-Osorio, Sara Quijano-Guauque, Sandra Briñez-Rodríguez, Gustavo Velasco-Flechas, Antonieta Muñoz-Solís, Carlos Chávez, Rafael Fernandez-Grisales

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multidimensional analysis of the impact of adenoid hypertrophy on pediatric dentofacial and airway structures and construction of a diagnostic model.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bridging the gap in aberrant root canal systems: Case series.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Néstor Ríos-OsorioResearch Department COC-CICO, Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia UNICOC, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6675-6789
Sara Quijano-GuauqueResearch Department COC-CICO, Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia UNICOC, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8249-6617
Sandra Briñez-RodríguezResearch Department COC-CICO, Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia UNICOC, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4791-9113
Gustavo Velasco-FlechasResearch Department COC-CICO, Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia UNICOC, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-1504
Antonieta Muñoz-SolísPostgraduate Endodontics Department, Costa Rica University, San Jose, Costa Rica.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2857-8465
Carlos ChávezPostgraduate Endodontics Department, IMED, Guadalajara, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8771-5325
Rafael Fernandez-GrisalesPostgraduate Endodontics Department, School of Dentistry, CES University, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1431-8373
Institución Universitaria Colegios de Colombia · COClínica CES · COHospital Civil de Guadalajara · MXUniversidad de Costa Rica · CR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of imaging methods that enable sensitive and specific observation of anatomical structures has been a constant in the evolution of endodontic therapy. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) enables 3-dimensional (3D) spatial anatomical navigation in the 3 volumetric planes (sagittal, coronal and axial) which translates into great accuracy for the identification of endodontic pathologies/conditions. CBCT interpretation consists of 2 main components: (i) the generation of specific tasks of the image and (ii) the subsequent interpretation report. A systematic and reproducible method to review CBCT scans can improve the accuracy of the interpretation process, translating into greater precision in terms of diagnosis and planning of endodontic clinical procedures. MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to March 2023. This narrative review addresses the theoretical concepts, elements of interpretation and applications of the CBCT scan in endodontics. In addition, the contents and rationale for reporting 3D endodontic imaging are discussed.

Indexed as

Cone-beam computed tomographyEndodonticsInterpretationReview

Identifiers

PMID38449497
PMCPMC10912545
OpenAlexW4390515830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.