Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38449031›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

A randomized trial of the Caregiver Interaction Profile (CIP) training with childcare providers: the Copenhagen Daycare Project study protocol.

Sophie Reijman, Clara Christensen Vieira, Tina Wahl Haase, Katrien O W Helmerhorst, Maiken Pontoppidan, Sofie Amalie Grosen, Ida Egmose, Katrine Røhder, Mette Skovgaard Vaever

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05654116 (The Copenhagen Daycare Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05654116 nacompletednot on this map

The Copenhagen Daycare Project: Enhancing the Role of Daycare Providers in Supporting Young Children's Social and Emotional Development

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2021 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsHealthy, Emotion Regulation, Language Development, Interactive Skills Daycare ProvidersArmsCaregiver Interaction Profile (CIP) training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie ReijmanCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. sophie.reijman@psy.ku.dk.
Clara Christensen VieiraCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tina Wahl HaaseCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katrien O W HelmerhorstDepartment of Pedagogy and Educational Sciences, Child and Family Welfare, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maiken PontoppidanDanish National Center for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sofie Amalie GrosenCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida EgmoseCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katrine RøhderCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette Skovgaard VaeverCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKDanish National Centre for Social Research · DKUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost young children (0-3 years) attend formal childcare in Denmark, many of them fulltime. Yet recent reports of the quality of Danish childcare centers have shown that in more than one-third of nurseries, the interactions between caregivers and young children (0-3 years) are of "insufficient" quality, which constitutes a risk for affected children's well-being and development. Effective interventions to improve childcare providers' interactive skills are necessary.

methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, we test the effectiveness of the Caregiver Interaction Profile training, which focuses on improving six core interactive skills: sensitive responsiveness, respecting children's autonomy, structuring and limit setting, verbal communication, developmental stimulation, and fostering positive peer interactions. We will recruit N = 200 childcare providers from nursery groups in Copenhagen (n = 100 training group, n = 100 waiting-list control group). Our primary outcomes are childcare providers' six interactive skills named above, observed from video-recorded interactions in the nursery groups. The secondary goal of our study is to test whether the training boosts children's social-emotional and linguistic development. To this end we aim to recruit N ≈ 500 children from participating childcare providers' nursery groups (n ≈ 250 training group, n ≈ 250 waiting-list control group). We measure social-emotional and linguistic development with various standardized questionnaires, filled out by parents and childcare providers. DISCUSSION: If the training is effective at improving childcare providers' interactive skills, then this will be an important foundation for implementation efforts, such as offering the training as part of the educational program of childcare providers. Future research should also evaluate whether the Caregiver Interaction Profile training is effective for childcare providers of older children (3-5 years) in Danish kindergartens.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as "Testing the Effects of the Caregiver Interaction Profile Training on the Interactive Skills of Daycare Providers (CDP)" with registry ID NCT05654116. Registration date: 12/01/2022.

Indexed as

CaregiversChild CareAdolescentChildChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolCommunicationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchoolsChild careInteractive skillsRandomized controlled trialTraining

Identifiers

PMID38449031
PMCPMC10918888
OpenAlexW4392519400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.