ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI-Based Sepsis Prediction in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review, Subgroup Meta-Analysis, and Contextual Analysis of Clinical Burden.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Revolutionizing sepsis diagnosis using machine learning and deep learning models: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the generalisability of LiSep LSTM for early prediction of septic shock across US and european cohorts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Delayed Admission to the Intensive Care Unit Is Associated With Increased Mortality Risk in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Factors associated with mortality in older sepsis patients: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Germany.Age and ageing · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based neonatal outcome prediction: an LSTM autoencoder framework for pattern analysis and risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine Learning in the ICU: Predicting Mortality in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of death in burn patients infected with antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using machine learning based techniques.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Hybrid phenotype-guided modeling across algorithm-feature regimes with application to ICU mortality prediction for Acinetobacter baumannii.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Simultaneous assessment of stress hyperglycemia ratio and glucose variability to predict all-cause mortality in sepsis patients across different glucose metabolic states: an observational cohort study with interpretable machine learning approach.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Improving Sepsis Mortality Prediction With Machine Learning Using Full Region Synthetic Sampling Approach.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Multiplex Targeted Proteomic Analysis of Cytokine Ratios for ICU Mortality in Severe COVID-19.Proteomes · 2025Article
- Review
- Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: Transforming Diagnostics, Treatment, and Patient Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Infectious Disease Surveillance, Diagnosis, and Prognosis.Viruses · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine-learning model that utilizes clinical features and inflammatory biomarkers to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients suffering from sepsis.
methodsWe enrolled all patients diagnosed with sepsis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV, v.2.0), eICU Collaborative Research Care (eICU-CRD 2.0), and the Amsterdam University Medical Centers databases (AmsterdamUMCdb 1.0.2). LASSO regression was employed for feature selection. Seven machine-learning methods were applied to develop prognostic models. The optimal model was chosen based on its accuracy, F1 score and area under curve (AUC) in the validation cohort. Moreover, we utilized the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to elucidate the effects of the features attributed to the model and analyze how individual features affect the model's output. Finally, Spearman correlation analysis examined the associations among continuous predictor variables. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) explored potential non-linear relationships between continuous risk factors and in-hospital mortality.
results3535 patients with sepsis were eligible for participation in this study. The median age of the participants was 66 years (IQR, 55-77 years), and 56% were male. After selection, 12 of the 45 clinical parameters collected on the first day after ICU admission remained associated with prognosis and were used to develop machine-learning models. Among seven constructed models, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.94 and an F1 score of 0.937 in the validation cohort. Feature importance analysis revealed that Age, AST, invasive ventilation treatment, and serum urea nitrogen (BUN) were the top four features of the XGBoost model with the most significant impact. Inflammatory biomarkers may have prognostic value. Furthermore, SHAP force analysis illustrated how the constructed model visualized the prediction of the model.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the potential of machine-learning approaches for early prediction of outcomes in patients with sepsis. The SHAP method could improve the interoperability of machine-learning models and help clinicians better understand the reasoning behind the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.