Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448965›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

UV light-mediated corneal crosslinking as (lymph)angioregressive pretreatment to promote graft survival after subsequent high-risk corneal transplantation (CrossCornealVision): protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Johanna Wiedemann, Deniz Hos, Endrik Limburg, Ulrike Zettelmeyer, Petra Schiller, Jeremy Franklin, Björn Bachmann, Daniel Böhringer, Tina Dietrich-Ntoukas, Thomas A Fuchsluger and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05870566 (UV Light-mediated Corneal Crosslinking as), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05870566 narecruitingnot on this map

UV Light-mediated Corneal Crosslinking as (Lymph)Angioregressive Pretreatment to Promote Graft Survival After Subsequent High-risk Corneal Transplantation [CrossCornealVision]

TypeinterventionalSponsorClaus CursiefenRan2023 to 2028Enrolled110ConditionsCorneal TransplantationArmsCorneal Crosslinking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna WiedemannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Deniz HosDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany. deniz.hos@uk-koeln.de.
Endrik LimburgClinical Trials Centre of Cologne (CTCC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ulrike ZettelmeyerClinical Trials Centre of Cologne (CTCC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Petra SchillerInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jeremy FranklinInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology (IMSB), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Björn BachmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel BöhringerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Tina Dietrich-NtoukasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universitaet Berlin, Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas A FuchslugerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Gerd GeerlingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan J LangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Wolfgang Johann MayerDepartment of Ophthalmology, LMU, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Siegfried PriglingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, LMU, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas ReinhardDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Claus CursiefenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DESaarland University · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung 01KG2127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGood vision highly depends on the transparency of the cornea, which is the "windscreen" of the eye. In fact, corneal blindness due to transparency loss is the second most common cause of blindness worldwide, and corneal transplantation is the main cure. Importantly, the cornea is normally avascular but can secondarily be invaded by pathological (blood and lymphatic) vessels due to severe inflammation, and the survival prognosis of a corneal graft mainly depends on the preoperative vascular condition of the recipient's cornea. Whereas transplants placed into avascular recipient beds enjoy long-term survival rates of > 90%, survival rates significantly decrease in pathologically pre-vascularized, so-called high-risk recipients, which account for around 10% of all performed transplants in Germany and > 75% in lower and middle-income countries worldwide.

methodsThis parallel-grouped, open-randomized, multicenter, prospective controlled exploratory investigator-initiated trial (IIT) intends to improve graft survival by preconditioning pathologically vascularized recipient corneas by (lymph)angioregressive treatment before high-risk corneal transplantation. For this purpose, corneal crosslinking (CXL) will be used, which has been shown to potently regress corneal blood and lymphatic vessels. Prior to transplantation, patients will be randomized into 2 groups: (1) CXL (intervention) or (2) no pretreatment (control). CXL will be repeated once if insufficient reduction of corneal neovascularization should be observed. All patients (both groups) will then undergo corneal transplantation. In the intervention group, remaining blood vessels will be additionally regressed using fine needle diathermy (on the day of transplantation). Afterwards, the incidence of graft rejection episodes will be evaluated for 24 months (primary endpoint). Overall graft survival, as well as regression of corneal vessels and/or recurrence, among other factors, will be analyzed (secondary endpoints). DISCUSSION: Based on preclinical and early pilot clinical evidence, we want to test the novel concept of temporary (lymph)angioregressive pretreatment of high-risk eyes by CXL to promote subsequent corneal graft survival. So far, there is no evidence-based approach to reliably improve graft survival in the high-risk corneal transplantation setting available in clinical routine. If successful, this approach will be the first to promote graft survival in high-risk transplants. It will significantly improve vision and quality of life in patients suffering from corneal blindness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05870566. Registered on 22 May 2023.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationGraft SurvivalBlindnessCorneaHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltraviolet RaysCorneaCorneal transplantationCrosslinking (CXL)Graft rejectionHigh-risk corneal transplantation(Lymph)angioregressive preconditioningMulticenter randomized clinical trial (RCT)NeovascularizationRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38448965
PMCPMC10916195
OpenAlexW4392517373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.