Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448894›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2024

Heterogeneity and overlap in the continuum of linguistic profile of logopenic and semantic variants of primary progressive aphasia: a Profile Analysis based on Multidimensional Scaling study.

Gaia Chiara Santi, Francesca Conca, Valentina Esposito, Cristina Polito, Silvia Paola Caminiti, Cecilia Boccalini, Carmen Morinelli, Valentina Berti, Salvatore Mazzeo, Valentina Bessi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Distinct cerebral perfusion patterns and linguistic profiles in Alzheimer's disease-related primary progressive aphasia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gaia Chiara SantiIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca ConcaIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy, Pavia, Italy.
Valentina EspositoIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy, Pavia, Italy.
Cristina PolitoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Silvia Paola CaminitiDepartment of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Cecilia BoccaliniVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Carmen MorinelliResearch and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Valentina BertiDepartment of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Salvatore MazzeoResearch and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Valentina BessiResearch and Innovation Centre for Dementia-CRIDEM, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Alessandra MarconeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Sandro IannacconeDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Se-Kang KimDepartment of Paediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sandro SorbiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.
Daniela PeraniVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Stefano F CappaIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy. stefano.cappa@iusspavia.it.
Eleonora CatricalàIUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITDon Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary progressive aphasia (PPA) diagnostic criteria underestimate the complex presentation of semantic (sv) and logopenic (lv) variants, in which symptoms partially overlap, and mixed clinical presentation (mixed-PPA) and heterogenous profile (lvPPA +) are frequent. Conceptualization of similarities and differences of these clinical conditions is still scarce.

methodsLexical, semantic, phonological, and working memory errors from nine language tasks of sixty-seven PPA were analyzed using Profile Analysis based on Multidimensional Scaling, which allowed us to create a distributed representation of patients' linguistic performance in a shared space. Patients had been studied with [

resultsPatients' profiles were distributed across a continuum. All PPA, but two, presented a lexical retrieval impairment, in terms of reduced production of verbs and nouns. svPPA patients occupied a fairly clumped space along the continuum, showing a preponderant semantic deficit, which correlated to fusiform gyrus hypometabolism, while only few presented working memory deficits. Adjacently, lvPPA + presented a semantic impairment combined with phonological deficits, which correlated with metabolism in the anterior fusiform gyrus and posterior middle temporal gyrus. Starting from the shared phonological deficit side, a large portion of the space was occupied by all lvPPA, showing a combination of phonological, lexical, and working memory deficits, with the latter correlating with posterior temporo-parietal hypometabolism. Mixed PPA did not show unique profile, distributing across the space. DISCUSSION: Different clinical PPA entities exist but overlaps are frequent. Identifying shared and unique clinical markers is critical for research and clinical practice. Further research is needed to identify the role of genetic and pathological factors in such distribution, including also higher sample size of less represented groups.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveSemanticsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLinguisticsMemory DisordersMultidimensional Scaling AnalysisFluorodeoxyglucose F18FDG-PETLexico-semanticsLogopenic PPAPhonologyProfile Analysis via Multidimensional ScalingSemantic PPAVerbal working memory

Identifiers

PMID38448894
PMCPMC10918940
OpenAlexW4392559817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.