Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448885›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Risk perception as a motivational resource during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of vaccination status and emerging variants.

Joachim Waterschoot, Maarten Vansteenkiste, Vincent Yzerbyt, Sofie Morbée, Olivier Klein, Olivier Luminet, Mathias Schmitz, Pascaline Van Oost, Eveline Van Raemdonck, Marie Brisbois and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joachim WaterschootFaculty of Psychology, Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. Joachim.Waterschoot@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0003-0845-9310
Maarten VansteenkisteFaculty of Psychology, Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Vincent YzerbytInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Sofie MorbéeFaculty of Psychology, Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Olivier KleinCenter for Social and Cultural Psychology (CeSCuP), Faculty of Psychological Sciences and Education, Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Olivier LuminetInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Mathias SchmitzInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Pascaline Van OostInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Eveline Van RaemdonckFaculty of Psychology, Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie BrisboisInstitute for Research in the Psychological Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Omer Van den BerghHealth Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Grant 3F023819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople's perceived risk of being infected and having severe illness was conceived as a motivational source of adherence to behavioral measures during the COVID-19 crisis.

methodsWe used online self-reported data, spanning 20 months of the COVID-19 crisis in Belgium (n = 221,791; 34.4% vaccinated; July 2020 - March 2022) to study the association between risk perception and motivation.

resultsBoth perceived infection probability and severity fluctuated across time as a function of the characteristics of emerging variants, with unvaccinated persons perceiving decreasingly less risk compared to vaccinated ones. Perceived severity (and not perceived probability) was the most critical predictor of autonomous motivation for adherence to health-protective measures, a pattern observed at both the between-day and between-person level among both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. An integrated process model further indicated that on days with higher hospitalization load, participants reported being more adherent because risk severity and autonomous motivation for adherence were more elevated on these days.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that risk severity served as a critical and dynamic resource for adherence to behavioral measures because it fostered greater autonomous regulation.

Indexed as

COVID-19MotivationHumansPandemicsPerceptionVaccinationBehaviorCOVID-19MotivationRisk perceptionVaccination

Identifiers

PMID38448885
PMCPMC10918917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.