ArticleBMC public health2024
Development and validation of a deep learning model for predicting postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancer.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastric cancer survival prediction using artificial intelligence models based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Survival Prediction Models for Young Patients With Gastric Cancer: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning models integrating attention mechanisms in operating room nursing quality and postoperative risk assessment for tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning radiomics analysis for prediction of survival in patients with unresectable gastric cancer receiving immunotherapy.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Predicting gastric cancer survival using machine learning: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The artificial intelligence revolution in gastric cancer management: clinical applications.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancers: Diagnostic, prognostic, and surgical strategies.Cancer letters · 2025Review
- Predictive Mortality and Gastric Cancer Risk Using Clinical and Socio-Economic Data: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning (DL), a specialized form of machine learning (ML), is valuable for forecasting survival in various diseases. Its clinical applicability in real-world patients with gastric cancer (GC) has yet to be extensively validated.
methodsA combined cohort of 11,414 GC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database and 2,846 patients from a Chinese dataset were utilized. The internal validation of different algorithms, including DL model, traditional ML models, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage model, was conducted by training and testing sets on the SEER database, followed by external validation on the Chinese dataset. The performance of the algorithms was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve, and calibration curve.
resultsDL model demonstrated superior performance in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) at 1, 3, and, 5 years post-surgery across both datasets, surpassing other ML models and AJCC stage model, with AUCs of 0.77, 0.80, and 0.82 in the SEER dataset and 0.77, 0.76, and 0.75 in the Chinese dataset, respectively. Furthermore, decision curve analysis revealed that the DL model yielded greater net gains at 3 years than other ML models and AJCC stage model, and calibration plots at 3 years indicated a favorable level of consistency between the ML and actual observations during external validation.
conclusionsDL-based model was established to accurately predict the survival rate of postoperative patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.