Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448835›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2024

The role of perioperative sedative anesthetics in preventing postoperative delirium: a systematic review and network-meta analysis including 6679 patients.

Jin-Xiang Huang, Shan-Shan Zhang, Shu-Xian Wang, Da-Shuang Xi, Fang-Ru Luo, Cheng-Jiang Liu, Hong Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Xiang Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shan-Shan Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shu-Xian Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Da-Shuang XiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fang-Ru LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Cheng-Jiang LiuDepartment of General Medicine, Affiliated Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anqing, China.
Hong LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China. lh78553@163.com.
Army Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNAnqing City Hospital · CNChongqing Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

national natural science foundation of china 82171265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePostoperative delirium is a common and debilitating complication that significantly affects patients and their families. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether there is an effective sedative that can prevent postoperative delirium while also examining the safety of using sedatives during the perioperative period.

methodsThe net-meta analysis was used to compare the incidence of postoperative delirium among four sedatives: sevoflurane, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam. Interventions were ranked according to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

resultsA total of 41 RCT studies involving 6679 patients were analyzed. Dexmedetomidine can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium than propofol (OR 0.47 95% CI 0.25-0.90), midazolam (OR 0.42 95% CI 0.17-1.00), normal saline (OR 0.42 95% CI 0.33-0.54) and sevoflurane (OR 0.39 95% CI 0.18-0.82). The saline group showed a significantly lower incidence of bradycardia compared to the group receiving dexmedetomidine (OR 0.55 95% CI 0.37-0.80). In cardiac surgery, midazolam (OR 3.34 95%CI 2.04-5.48) and normal saline (OR 2.27 95%CI 1.17-4.39) had a higher rate of postoperative delirium than dexmedetomidine, while in non-cardiac surgery, normal saline (OR 1.98 95%CI 1.44-2.71) was more susceptible to postoperative delirium than dexmedetomidine.

conclusionOur analysis suggests that dexmedetomidine is an effective sedative in preventing postoperative delirium whether in cardiac surgery or non-cardiac surgery. The preventive effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium becomes more apparent with longer surgical and extubation times. However, it should be administered with caution as it was found to be associated with bradycardia.

Indexed as

AnestheticsEmergence DeliriumHypnotics and SedativesBradycardiaDexmedetomidineHumansMidazolamPropofolSaline SolutionSevofluraneAnestheticsDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamPropofolSaline SolutionSevofluraneDexmedetomidineMidazolamPostoperative deliriumPropofolSevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID38448835
PMCPMC10916082
OpenAlexW4392516326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.