Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448825›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Nutrient availability and plant phenological stage influence the substrate microbiome in container-grown Impatiens walleriana 'Xtreme Red'.

Juan Quijia Pillajo, Laura J Chapin, Cristian D Quiroz-Moreno, James E Altland, Michelle L Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Quijia PillajoDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2781-742X
Laura J ChapinDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.
Cristian D Quiroz-MorenoDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-9147
James E AltlandApplication Technology Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.
Michelle L JonesDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA. jones.1968@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2979-5527
The Ohio State University · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

USDA- ARS and the USDA Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative 5082-21000-001-27S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe microbiome plays a fundamental role in plant health and performance. Soil serves as a reservoir of microbial diversity where plants attract microorganisms via root exudates. The soil has an important impact on the composition of the rhizosphere microbiome, but greenhouse ornamental plants are commonly grown in soilless substrates. While soil microbiomes have been extensively studied in traditional agriculture to improve plant performance, health, and sustainability, information about the microbiomes of soilless substrates is still limited. Thus, we conducted an experiment to explore the microbiome of a peat-based substrate used in container production of Impatiens walleriana, a popular greenhouse ornamental plant. We investigated the effects of plant phenological stage and fertilization level on the substrate microbiome.

resultsImpatiens plants grown under low fertilization rates were smaller and produced more flowers than plants grown under optimum and high fertilization. The top five bacterial phyla present in the substrate were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteriodota, Verrucomicrobiota, and Planctomycetota. We found a total of 2,535 amplicon sequence variants (ASV) grouped into 299 genera. The substrate core microbiome was represented by only 1.8% (48) of the identified ASV. The microbiome community composition was influenced by plant phenological stage and fertilizer levels. Phenological stage exhibited a stronger influence on microbiome composition than fertilizer levels. Differential abundance analysis using DESeq2 identified more ASVs significantly affected (enriched or depleted) in the high fertilizer levels at flowering. As observed for community composition, the effect of plant phenological stage on microbial community function was stronger than fertilizer level. Phenological stage and fertilizer treatments did not affect alpha-diversity in the substrate.

conclusionsIn container-grown ornamental plants, the substrate serves as the main microbial reservoir for the plant, and the plant and agricultural inputs (fertilization) modulate the microbial community structure and function of the substrate. The differences observed in substrate microbiome composition across plant phenological stage were explained by pH, total organic carbon (TOC) and fluoride, and across fertilizer levels by pH and phosphate (PO

Indexed as

ImpatiensMicrobiotaFertilizersNutrientsSoilFertilizersNutrientsSoil16S rRNABeta diversityFertilizerFloricultureMicrobiotaPeat

Identifiers

PMID38448825
PMCPMC10916185
OpenAlexW4392510058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.