Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448785›Full record

Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology2024

Antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol based on rectal swab culture before prostate biopsy to prevent infectious complications: a prospective randomized comparative study.

A Bouzouita, A Rehaiem, A Saadi, S Zaghbib, M Chakroun, H Ayed, A Ferjani, A Derouiche, I Boutiba-Ben Boubaker, M R Ben Slama

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Bouzouita *Urology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
A Rehaiem *Microbiology Departments, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia. amel.rehaiem@fmt.utm.tn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7245-1976
A SaadiUrology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
S ZaghbibUrology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
M ChakrounUrology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
H AyedUrology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
A FerjaniMicrobiology Departments, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
A DerouicheUrology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
I Boutiba-Ben BoubakerMicrobiology Departments, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
M R Ben SlamaUrology Department, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia.
Hôpital Charles-Nicolle · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the benefit of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) based on rectal swab culture in comparison with standard empiric antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate (TRUS-BP), as well as to assess rate of fecal carriage of Fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales FQRE. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe prospectively analyzed data that randomized 157 patients within two groups: (G1) TAP according to rectal swab performed 10 days before PB; (G2): empirical antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin. Prevalence of FQRE digestive carriage and risk factors were investigated. Incidence of infectious complications after (TRUS-BP) in each group was compared.

resultsG2 included 80 patients versus 77 in G1. There was no difference between the two groups regarding age, diabetes, prostate volume, PSA, number of biopsy cores, and risk factors for FQRE. In G2, the prevalence of FQRE digestive carriage was 56.3% all related to E. coli species. In the case of digestive carriage of FQRE, TAP according to the rectal swab culture with third-generation cephalosporins was performed in 73.3%. Patients with FQRE had history of FQ use within the last 6 months in 17.8% (p = 0.03). Rate of febrile urinary tract infection after PB was 13% in G1 and 3.8% in G2 (p = 0.02).

conclusionsIncidence of FQ resistance in the intestinal flora of our local population was prevalent. Risk factor for resistance was the use of FQ within the last 6 months. TAP adapted to rectal swab, mainly with third-generation cephalosporins, significantly reduced the rate of infectious complications after (TRUS-BP).

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisProstateRectumAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinAntibiotic prophylaxisEnterobacteralesFluoroquinolone resistanceInfectious complicationProstate biopsyRectal swab

Identifiers

PMID38448785
OpenAlexW4392759221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.