Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448777›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026

Deep learning model to predict Ki-67 expression of breast cancer using digital breast tomosynthesis.

Ken Oba, Maki Adachi, Tomoya Kobayashi, Eichi Takaya, Daiki Shimokawa, Toshinori Fukuda, Kengo Takahashi, Kazuyo Yagishita, Takuya Ueda, Hiroko Tsunoda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ken ObaDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Maki AdachiDepartment of Clinical Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Tomoya KobayashiDepartment of Clinical Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Eichi TakayaAI Lab, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Daiki ShimokawaDepartment of Clinical Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Toshinori FukudaDepartment of Radiology, Oregon Health of Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239-2098, USA.
Kengo TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Kazuyo YagishitaDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Takuya UedaDepartment of Clinical Imaging, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. takuya.ueda.d3@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-5791
Hiroko TsunodaDepartment of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Corporation CREST JPMJCR15D1Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI 20H03738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeveloping a deep learning (DL) model for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images to predict Ki-67 expression.

methodsThe institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent from the patients. Initially, 499 patients (mean age: 50.5 years, range: 29-90 years) referred to our hospital for breast cancer were participated, 126 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer were selected and their Ki-67 expression measured. The Xception architecture was used in the DL model to predict Ki-67 expression levels. The high Ki-67 vs low Ki-67 expression diagnostic performance of our DL model was assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and by using sub-datasets divided by the radiological characteristics of breast cancer.

resultsThe average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.912, 0.629, 0.985, and 0.883, respectively. The AUC of the four subgroups separated by radiological findings for the mass, calcification, distortion, and focal asymmetric density sub-datasets were 0.890, 0.750, 0.870, and 0.660, respectively.

conclusionsOur results suggest the potential application of our DL model to predict the expression of Ki-67 using DBT, which may be useful for preoperatively determining the treatment strategy for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningKi-67 AntigenMammographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityKi-67 AntigenBreast cancerDBTDeep learningFFDMKi-67

Identifiers

PMID38448777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.