ArticleAnnals of intensive care2024
Impact of a multidisciplinary management team on clinical outcome in ICU patients affected by Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a pre-post quasi-experimental study.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Personalizing beta-lactams therapy in critical patients undergoing RRT: moving a further step forward?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Development of a multidisciplinary cooperative nutrition management process for critically ill patients-a Delphi expert consensus study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Micturition Syncope Secondary to Urethral Obstruction with Multisystem Complications: A Case Report.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial stewardship programs in sepsis treatment: principles, impact, and future directions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Case Report: Progressive limb necrosis as a portal to multifocal osteomyelitis in pediatric septic shock: a tissue-oriented management paradigm.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Integrated Multimodal Strategy to Reduce Healthcare-Associated Infections in a Trauma ICU: Impact of a Quality Improvement Project.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A novel intelligent approach for infection protection using a multidisciplinary collaboration in regional general hospitals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association Between Infectious Diseases Consultation and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Gram-negative Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective Population-wide Cohort Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic issues for optimizing treatment with beta-lactams of Gram-negative infections in critically ill orthotopic liver transplant recipients: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2024Review
- Characteristics of OralInfection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiology, Antibiotic Susceptibilities, and Risk Factors for in-Hospital Death.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBloodstream infections (BSIs) by Gram-negative pathogens play a major role in intensive care patients, both in terms of prevalence and severity, especially if multi-drug resistant pathogens are involved. Early appropriate antibiotic therapy is therefore a cornerstone in the management of these patients, and growing evidence shows that implementation of a multidisciplinary team may improve patients' outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological impact of the application of a multidisciplinary team on critically ill patients.
methodsPre-post study enrolling critically ill patients with Gram negative bloodstream infection in intensive care unit. In the pre-intervention phase (from January until December 2018) patients were managed with infectious disease consultation on demand, in the post-intervention phase (from January until December 2022) patients were managed with a daily evaluation by a multidisciplinary team composed of intensivist, infectious disease physician, clinical pharmacologist and microbiologist.
resultsOverall, 135 patients were enrolled during the study period, of them 67 (49.6%) in the pre-intervention phase and 68 (50.4%) in the post-intervention phase. Median age was 67 (58-75) years, sex male was 31.9%. Septic shock, the need for continuous renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation at BSI onset were similar in both groups, no difference of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) prevalence was observed. In the post-phase, empirical administration of carbapenems decreased significantly (40.3% vs. 62.7%, p = 0.02) with an increase of appropriate empirical therapy (86.9% vs. 55.2%, p < 0.001) and a decrease of overall antibiotic treatment (12 vs. 16 days, p < 0.001). Despite no differences in delta SOFA and all-cause 30-day mortality, a significant decrease in microbiological failure (10.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.005) and a new-onset 30-day MDRO colonization (8.3% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001) in the post-phase was reported. At multivariable analysis adjusted for main covariates, the institution of a multidisciplinary management team (MMT) was found to be protective both for new MDRO colonization [OR 0.17, 95%CI(0.05-0.67)] and microbiological failure [OR 0.37, 95%CI (0.14-0.98)].
conclusionsThe institution of a MMT allowed for an optimization of antimicrobial treatments, reflecting to a significant decrease in new MDRO colonization and microbiological failure among critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.