Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448744›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Noninvasive Assessment of Intracranial Pressure: Deformability Index as an Adjunct to Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter to Increase Diagnostic Ability.

Dag Ferner Netteland, Mads Aarhus, Else Charlotte Sandset, Llewellyn Padayachy, Eirik Helseth, Reidar Brekken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dag Ferner NettelandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. dagnet@ous-hf.no.ORCID 0009-0008-0382-0713
Mads AarhusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Else Charlotte SandsetDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Llewellyn PadayachyDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Eirik HelsethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Reidar BrekkenDepartment of Health Research, Medical Technology, SINTEF, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority grant number 2019010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement remains the standard, but its invasiveness limits availability. Here, we evaluate a novel ultrasound-based optic nerve sheath parameter called the deformability index (DI) and its ability to assess ICP noninvasively. Furthermore, we ask whether combining DI with optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), a more established parameter, results in increased diagnostic ability, as compared to using ONSD alone.

methodsWe prospectively included adult patients with traumatic brain injury with invasive ICP monitoring, which served as the reference measurement. Ultrasound images and videos of the optic nerve sheath were acquired. ONSD was measured at the bedside, whereas DI was calculated by semiautomated postprocessing of ultrasound videos. Correlations of ONSD and DI to ICP were explored, and a linear regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a linear regression model using ONSD alone. Ability of the noninvasive parameters to distinguish dichotomized ICP was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a logistic regression model combining ONSD and DI was compared to a logistic regression model using ONSD alone.

resultsForty-four ultrasound examinations were performed in 26 patients. Both DI (R =  - 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] R <  - 0.03; p = 0.03) and ONSD (R = 0.45; 95% CI R > 0.23; p < 0.01) correlated with ICP. When including both parameters in a combined model, the estimated correlation coefficient increased (R = 0.51; 95% CI R > 0.30; p < 0.01), compared to using ONSD alone, but the model improvement did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.09). Both DI (area under the curve [AUC] 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.83) and ONSD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.86) displayed ability to distinguish ICP dichotomized at ICP ≥ 15 mm Hg. When using both parameters in a combined model, AUC increased (0.80, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), and the model improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.02).

conclusionsCombining ONSD with DI holds the potential of increasing the ability of optic nerve sheath parameters in the noninvasive assessment of ICP, compared to using ONSD alone, and further study of DI is warranted.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticIntracranial PressureOptic NerveUltrasonographyAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntracranial HypertensionMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultDeformability indexIntracranial pressureNoninvasiveOptic nerve sheath diameterTraumatic brain injuryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38448744
PMCPMC11377659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.