Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448610›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2025

Evaluating the management trends for priapism and assessing the risk of priapism after in-office intracavernosal injections: a cross-sectional analysis.

Joon Yau Leong, Zachary J Prebay, David Ebbott, Michael Li, Paul H Chung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The assessment and aetiology of drug-induced ischaemic priapism.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joon Yau LeongDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-8442
Zachary J PrebayDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-9633
David EbbottDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael LiCenter for Digital Health and Data Science, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-2637
Paul H ChungDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. paul.chung@jefferson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9360-1400
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the management trends of patients suffering from any priapism and evaluate the risks of developing priapism after intracavernosal injections (ICI) performed in office. We queried TriNetX for two separate male adult cohorts - those presenting with any priapism based on International Classification of Disease code, N48.3 (priapism) and those who underwent ICI in office based on Current Procedural Terminology code, 54235 (injection of corpora cavernosa with pharmacologic agent[s]). We evaluated treatment options for these patients after any priapism and described demographic risks for developing priapism after ICI performed in office. There were 17,545 priapism encounters and 26,104 usages of ICI in the office. Most common treatment for any priapism was corporal irrigation/injection of medications (11.3%). Patients presenting with priapism after ICI were younger (age > 65 years, OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.38-0.51], p < 0.01) and had a higher prevalence of mood disorders (20% vs 14%), behavioral disorders (7% vs 2%) and sickle cell disease (6% vs <1%). They were less likely to have diabetes (14% vs 22%), hypertension (33% vs 40%), prostate cancer (13% vs 25%) or have taken sildenafil or tadalafil (29-30% vs 35-38%). For patients administering ICI, proper screening and counseling of priapism is important to reduce complications.

Indexed as

PriapismAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedPenisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38448610
PMCPMC12185315
OpenAlexW4392520342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.