Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448578›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2024

Blood pressure outcomes at 18 months in primary care patients prescribed remote physiological monitoring for hypertension: a prospective cohort study.

Stephen D Persell, Lauren Anthony, Yaw A Peprah, Ji Young Lee, Jim Li, Hironori Sato, Lucia C Petito

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07397260 (Effects of Manually Recorded or Automatically Transmitted Home Blood Pressures With or Without Automated Patient Feedback on Hypertension Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07397260 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Manually Recorded or Automatically Transmitted Home Blood Pressures With or Without Automated Patient Feedback on Hypertension Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,304ConditionsHypertension (HTN)ArmsSelf report of home measured blood pressure via patient EHR portal, Automated feedback about home blood pressure results, Automated Transmission of Remotely Measured Blood Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen D PersellDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. spersell@nm.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2462-1314
Lauren AnthonyNorthwestern Medical Group Quality and Patient Safety, Northwestern Memorial Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yaw A PeprahDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7211-9519
Ji Young LeeDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6102-0510
Jim LiStrategic Clinical RD Department, Technology Development HQ, Omron Healthcare, Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7125-9461
Hironori SatoData Analytics Department, Technology Development HQ, Omron Healthcare, Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-8175-7256
Lucia C PetitoDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-1219
Northwestern University · USOmron (Japan) · JPNorthwestern Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pragmatic matched cohort study using EHR data extended the follow up to 18 months for BP outcomes comparing individuals prescribed remote patient monitoring (n = 288) and temporally-matched controls (n = 1152) from six primary care practices. After 18 months, the RPM-prescribed cohort had greater BP control < 140/90 mm Hg (RPM cohort: 71.5%, control cohort: 51.9%, p < 0.001) and lower systolic BP (131.6 versus 136.0 mm Hg, p = 0.004) using office and home measurements. BP control at 18 months assessed by office measurements only was also higher in the RPM group (62.2% versus 51.9%, p = 0.004).

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionBlood PressureCohort StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38448578
PMCPMC10940150
OpenAlexW4392506709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.