ArticleNature2024
Geologists reject the Anthropocene as Earth's new epoch - after 15 years of debate.
Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultra-traceAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Natural history in the Anthropocene.Bioscience · 2026Article
- Scientists' Warning on the Rapid Evolution of Parasites in the Anthropocene.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Review
- Managing and mitigating future public health risks: Planetary boundaries, global catastrophic risk, and inclusive wealth.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- The precision land knowledge of the past enables tailor-made environment therapy and empathy for nature.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Extinction of the human species: What could cause it and how likely is it to occur?Cambridge prisms. Extinction · 2025Review
- [Planetary health and mental health].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38448535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.