ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2023
Development and evaluation of acceptance scale for artificial intelligence in digestive endoscopy by subjects.
Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDigestive endoscopy is an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool for digestive system diseases. The artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system in endoscopy (hereinafter referred to as AI in digestive endoscopy) has broad application prospects in the field of digestive endoscopy. The trust and acceptance of endoscopic subjects are the cornerstone of the research, application, and promotion of AI in digestive endoscopy. Currently, the tools for measuring the acceptance of AI in digestive endoscopy by subjects are limited at home and abroad. This study aims to develop a scale for measuring the acceptance of AI in digestive endoscopy by subjects, then to evaluate its reliability and validity.
methodsBy conducting literature research, an item pool and dimensions were constructed, and a preliminary scale was constructed using Delphi method. Through the first stage of the survey on the subjects, the reliability and validity of the scale were tested, and the revised scale was used for the second stage of survey on the subjects to further verify the structural validity of the scale.
resultsThe acceptance scale for AI in digestive endoscopy included 11 items in 3 dimensions: accuracy, ethics, benefit and willingness. In the first stage of the survey, 351 valid questionnaires were collected, and the Cronbach's α was 0.864. The correlation coefficient between the total score of the scale and the score of the test item was 0.636, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value in exploratory factor analysis was 0.788. In the second stage of the survey, 335 valid questionnaires were collected, and in confirmatory factor analysis, the
conclusionsAcceptance scale for AI in digestive endoscopy by subjects developed in this study has good reliability and validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.