Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448251›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Young Women's Perspectives on Being Screened for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk During Routine Primary Care.

Mady Head, Betty Cohn, Karen J Wernli, Lorella Palazzo, Kelly Ehrlich, Abigail Matson, Sarah Knerr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Global, regional, and national burden of ovarian cancer among young women during 1990-2019.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mady HeadGenetic Counseling Graduate Program, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Betty CohnInstitute for Public Health Genetics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Karen J WernliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Lorella PalazzoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Kelly EhrlichKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Abigail MatsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Sarah KnerrDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: saknerr@uw.edu.

Funding

Population Management for Hereditary Cancer Prevention: Implementation, Effectiveness, and Acceptability within a Learning Health System.K08HG010488 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KNERR, SARAH · 2019 to 2021
$418k
NHGRI NIH HHS K08 HG010488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening women to identify individuals eligible for genetic counseling based on a priori hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) risk (i.e., risk assessment). However, risk assessment has not been widely integrated into primary care. This qualitative study explored young women's views on implementing routine HBOC risk assessment with a focus on equity and patient-centeredness.

methodsWe conducted group discussions with young women (aged 21-40 years) receiving care in an integrated health care system. Discussion groups occurred in two phases and used a modified deliberative approach that included a didactic component and prioritized developing consensus. Twenty women participated in one of three initial small group discussions (phase one). All 20 were invited to participate in a subsequent large group discussion (phase two), and 15 of them attended.

findingsKey themes and recommendations were as follows. Risk assessment should be accessible, contextualized, and destigmatized to encourage participation and reduce anxiety, particularly for women who do not know their family history. Providers conducting risk assessments must be equipped to address women's informational needs, relieve emotionality, and plan next steps after positive screens. Finally, to minimize differential screening uptake, health care systems must prioritize equity in program design and contribute to external educational and outreach efforts.

conclusionYoung women see pragmatic opportunities for health systems to optimize HBOC screening implementation.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingOvarian NeoplasmsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHumansMass ScreeningRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID38448251
PMCPMC11116046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.