ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2024
Information in summaries of product characteristics about use in children is limited and needs standardisation: a systematic analysis in Switzerland.
Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Parental awareness, attitudes and decision-making of off-label use in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA considerable proportion of drugs administered to children are not authorised for this purpose, and consequently off-label use is common in paediatric care. Our aims were to quantify systematically the number of drugs authorised in Switzerland for use in children based on their current summary of product characteristics (SmPC) and to assess the quality of this information.
methodsWe used natural language processing to screen all Swiss SmPCs, available in German language in the open-source drug database, for information about use in children. Based on the SmPCs of the most frequently used drugs in Swiss children's hospitals, 10 search terms were defined to retrieve this information.
resultsOf the analysed 4214 drugs corresponding to 1553 active substances, 2322 (55.1%) drugs were authorised for use in children. In only 639 (15.2%) SmPCs, information about authorisation for children was found in the section 'Therapeutic indications'. 320 (13.8%) SmPCs of drugs authorised for use in children contained only verbal age indications such as 'children' and 'adolescents' without a clear definition of the age or an age range.
conclusionsMost Swiss SmPCs contain information about children, but only a minority refer to an official indication. Even if some SmPCs clearly indicate that use in children is authorised, a clear statement of the age at which the drug may be administered is missing. Standardisation of information about use in children in SmPCs is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.