ArticleBMJ open2024
Epicardial left atrial appendage clipping versus direct oral anticoagulant to reduce stroke risk in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (LAA-CLIP): rationale, design and study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06021808 (Epicardial Left Atrial Appendage Clipping Versus Novel Oral Anticoagulants to Reduce Stroke Risk in Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Epicardial Left Atrial Appendage Clipping Versus Novel Oral Anticoagulants to Reduce Stroke Risk in Non-paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges and solutions for optimizing outcomes in patients undergoing surgical left atrial appendage closure.Future cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing globally, and stroke prevention is the key to reduce the morbidity and mortality related to AF. Currently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the primary options for stroke prevention, while it increases risk of bleeding. Left atrial appendage (LAA) is suspected as a vital source of cerebral emboli and may lead to ischaemic stroke, and thoracoscopic LAA clipping procedure provides an alternative option for stroke prevention in high-risk patients. However, high-quality evidence comparing LAA clipping to DOACs in terms of stroke prevention is lacking. This trial is designed to assess whether the efficacy of thoracoscopic LAA clipping is superior to DOACs for stroke prevention in AF patients at high risk of thrombosis (CHA METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, open-labelled, randomised controlled study. This trial will randomly assign 290 patients with non-paroxysmal AF to thoracoscopic LAA clipping group or DOAC therapy group in a 1:1 randomisation. The primary endpoint is defined as a composite endpoint event consisting of stroke, systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, major bleeding events and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events at 24 months after randomisation. The secondary endpoints consist of the components of the primary composite endpoint, surgery-related adverse events and minor bleeding events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The central ethics committee at Fuwai Hospital approved the trial entitled "Epicardial left atrial appendage clipping versus direct oral anticoagulant to reduce stroke risk in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (LAA-CLIP trial)". The results of this study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06021808.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.