Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448069›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2024

Impact of the design of adult mental health inpatient facilities on healthcare staff: a mixed methods systematic review.

Laura Rodríguez-Labajos, Joanne Kinloch, Louise Nicol, Susan Grant, Geraldine O'Brien

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Rodríguez-LabajosNHSScotland Assure, Research Service, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK Laura.Rodriguez-Labajos@nhs.scot.ORCID 0000-0002-4144-2660
Joanne KinlochNHSScotland Assure, Research Service, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Louise NicolNHSScotland Assure, Research Service, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Susan GrantNHSScotland Assure, Procurement, Commissioning and Facilities, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Geraldine O'BrienNHSScotland Assure, Research Service, NHS National Services Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
National Health Service Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMental health inpatient facilities are increasingly focusing on creating therapeutic, person-centred care environments. However, research shows that this focus may have unintended consequences for healthcare staff. Designs that do not pay attention to staff needs may risk contributing to stress, burnout, job dissatisfaction and mental exhaustion in the work environment. This systematic review aims to identify and synthesise current research on the design factors of adult mental health inpatient facilities that impact healthcare staff.

designA mixed method systematic review was conducted to search for empirical, peer-reviewed studies using the databases CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed and Web of Science from their inception up to 5 September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal checklists were used to assess the methodological quality of the eligible studies. Data were extracted and grouped based on the facility design factors.

resultsIn our review, we included 29 peer-reviewed empirical studies that identified crucial design factors impacting healthcare staff in adult mental health inpatient facilities. Key factors included layouts providing optimal visibility, designated work and respite areas, and centrally located nursing stations. Notably, mixed perceptions regarding the benefits and challenges of open and glass-enclosed nursing stations suggest areas requiring further research. Facilities in geographically remote locations also emerged as a factor influencing staff dynamics. Additionally, although only supported by a limited number of studies, the significance of artwork, sensory rooms for respite, appropriate furniture and equipment, and access to alarms was acknowledged as contributory factors.

conclusionThrough the synthesis of existing research, this review identified that the design of mental health facilities significantly impacts staff well-being, satisfaction, performance and perception of safety. Concluding that, in order to create a well-designed therapeutic environment, it is essential to account for both service users and staff user needs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022368155.

Indexed as

Facility Design and ConstructionHealth PersonnelInpatientsMental HealthAdultDelivery of Health CareHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMENTAL HEALTHNursesSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID38448069
PMCPMC10916155
OpenAlexW4392513738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.