Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448061›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Analysis of problems and potentials for increasing pandemic resilience in public health administrations in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany-a mixed-methods approach.

Pascal Samtlebe, Jana Niemann, Jenny Markert, Anja Knöchelmann, Marie Bernard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pascal SamtlebeFaculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg Institute of Medical Sociology, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany pascal.samtlebe@medizin.uni-halle.de.ORCID 0009-0004-7813-8795
Jana NiemannMartin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6094-5143
Jenny MarkertFaculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg Institute of Medical Sociology, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.
Anja KnöchelmannInstitute of Medical Sociology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Medical Faculty, Halle/Saale, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-9024
Marie BernardInstitute of Medical Sociology, Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-4057
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DELuther University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has shown the importance of resilient, modern, and well-equipped public health administrations from national to communal levels. In Germany, the surveillance, contact tracing, and local adaptions went through local health offices, revealing both their important role and also their lack of equipment and general preparation for health crises. Research on the mode of operation of the public health service (PHS), especially in a time of crisis, is rare. The present study aims to qualitatively and quantitatively assess problem areas, conflict potentials, and challenges that have become apparent for the PHS of Saxony-Anhalt during the pandemic. It focuses on the individual insight of employees of the PHS of Saxony-Anhalt and its 14 health offices to derive concrete needs and fields of action for increasing pandemic preparedness. Furthermore, the prospective personnel and resource-based requirements as well as the necessary structural and organisational changes of the public health departments are to be considered. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will follow a sequential mixed-methods approach. Introductory expert interviews (n=12) with leading staff of Saxony-Anhalt's PHS will be conducted, followed by focus group interviews (n=4) with personnel from all departments involved in the pandemic response. Thereafter, a quantitative survey will be carried out to validate and complement the results of the qualitative phase. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained by the Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg ethics commission (Ref number 2023-102). The authors will submit the results of the study to relevant peer-reviewed journals and give national and international oral presentations to researchers, members of the PHS, and policymakers.

Indexed as

PandemicsResilience, PsychologicalGermanyHumansProspective StudiesPublic Health AdministrationCOVID-19HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID38448061
PMCPMC10916120
OpenAlexW4392514071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.