Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38448040›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the emergency department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure.

James A Hughes, Sarah Hazelwood, Anna-Lisa Lyrstedt, Lee Jones, Nathan J Brown, Rajeev Jarugula, Clint Douglas, Kevin Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James A HughesSchool of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia j1.hughes@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-2489
Sarah HazelwoodEmergency Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Anna-Lisa LyrstedtEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Lee JonesQueensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5686-1155
Nathan J BrownEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7149-8895
Rajeev JarugulaEmergency Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Clint DouglasFaculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4131-5044
Kevin ChuEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-7174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn general, the quality of pain care in emergency departments (ED) is poor, despite up to 80% of all ED patients presenting with pain. This may be due to the lack of well-validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain care in the ED setting. The American Pain Society-Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised Edition (APS-POQ-R), with slight modification for ED patients, is a potentially useful PROM for the adult ED, however it is yet to be completely validated.

methodsAdult patients, who had presented with moderate to severe acute pain, were recruited at two large inner-city EDs in Australia. A modified version of the APS-POQ-R was administered at the completion of their ED care. Responses were randomly split into three groups and underwent multiple rounds of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis with testing for construct, convergent, divergent validity and internal consistency.

resultsA total of 646 ED patients (55.6% female), with a median age of 48.3 years, and moderate to severe pain on arrival, completed the ED-modified APS-POQ-R. Psychometric evaluation resulted in a reduced nine-question tool, which measures three constructs (pain relief and satisfaction (α=0.891), affective distress (α=0.823) and pain interference (α=0.908)) and demonstrated construct, convergent, divergent validity, and internal consistency.

conclusionsThis new tool, which we refer to as the American Pain Society-Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised for the ED (APS-POQ-RED), should form the basis for reporting patient-reported outcomes of ED pain care in future quality improvement and research.

Indexed as

PainPain ManagementAdultAustraliaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresEmergency departmentPainQuality measurement

Identifiers

PMID38448040
PMCPMC10916172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.