Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38447590›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Empowering personalized pharmacogenomics with generative AI solutions.

Mullai Murugan, Bo Yuan, Eric Venner, Christie M Ballantyne, Katherine M Robinson, James C Coons, Liwen Wang, Philip E Empey, Richard A Gibbs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Impact of Access to Clinical Guidelines on LLM-Based Treatment Recommendations for Chronic Hepatitis B.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PGxQA: A Resource for Evaluating LLM Performance for Pharmacogenomic QA Tasks.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mullai MuruganHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-2613
Bo YuanHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Eric VennerHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Christie M BallantyneSections of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Katherine M RobinsonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
James C CoonsSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Liwen WangHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Philip E EmpeySchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Richard A GibbsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The Baylor-Hopkins Clinical Genomics Center for All of UsOT2OD002751 · OD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BOERWINKLE, ERIC A., DOHENY, KIMBERLY F · 2018 to 2023
$152.8M
NIH HHS 1OT2OD002751NIH HHS OT2 OD002751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluates an AI assistant developed using OpenAI's GPT-4 for interpreting pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing results, aiming to improve decision-making and knowledge sharing in clinical genetics and to enhance patient care with equitable access. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe AI assistant employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which combines retrieval and generative techniques, by harnessing a knowledge base (KB) that comprises data from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). It uses context-aware GPT-4 to generate tailored responses to user queries from this KB, further refined through prompt engineering and guardrails.

resultsEvaluated against a specialized PGx question catalog, the AI assistant showed high efficacy in addressing user queries. Compared with OpenAI's ChatGPT 3.5, it demonstrated better performance, especially in provider-specific queries requiring specialized data and citations. Key areas for improvement include enhancing accuracy, relevancy, and representative language in responses. DISCUSSION: The integration of context-aware GPT-4 with RAG significantly enhanced the AI assistant's utility. RAG's ability to incorporate domain-specific CPIC data, including recent literature, proved beneficial. Challenges persist, such as the need for specialized genetic/PGx models to improve accuracy and relevancy and addressing ethical, regulatory, and safety concerns.

conclusionThis study underscores generative AI's potential for transforming healthcare provider support and patient accessibility to complex pharmacogenomic information. While careful implementation of large language models like GPT-4 is necessary, it is clear that they can substantially improve understanding of pharmacogenomic data. With further development, these tools could augment healthcare expertise, provider productivity, and the delivery of equitable, patient-centered healthcare services.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineArtificial IntelligenceHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalKnowledge BasesPharmacogenomic TestingAI assistantgenerative AIlarge language modelsOpenAI GPT-4pharmacogenomic testingretrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID38447590
PMCPMC11105140
OpenAlexW4392565345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.