ArticleBlood advances2024
Mutations in myeloid transcription factors and activated signaling genes predict chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitochondrial DNA mutations are associated with impaired oxidative phosphorylation and enhanced imatinib response in chronic myeloid leukemia.HemaSphere · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors in chronic myeloid leukemia: at diagnosis and for treatment-free remission.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Article
- ConcurrentEJHaem · 2026Article
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Historical Perspective, Pathophysiology, and Treatment Advances.Acta haematologica · 2026Review
- Real-world experience with CPX-351 for secondary acute myeloid leukaemia: Comparison with FLAG-IDA in a propensity score matching analysis.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Epigenetic alterations in Myeloid Malignancies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Integrating Asciminib into the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Canadian Perspective.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
- Observational
- Advancing chronic myeloid leukemia research with next-generation sequencing: potential benefits, limitations, and future clinical integration.Human genetics · 2025Review
- A CML Patient Carrying BCR::ABL1 Splicing Variants Did Not Experience Blast Crisis for 15 Years without Responding to Various TKIs.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAdvancements in genomics are transforming the clinical management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) toward precision medicine. The impact of somatic mutations on treatment outcomes is still under debate. We studied the association of somatic mutations in epigenetic modifier genes and activated signaling/myeloid transcription factors (AS/MTFs) with disease progression and treatment failure in patients with CML after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. A total of 394 CML samples were sequenced, including 254 samples collected at initial diagnosis and 140 samples taken during follow-up. Single-molecule molecular inversion probe (smMIP)-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) was conducted targeting recurrently mutated loci in 40 genes, with a limit of detection of 0.2%. Seventy mutations were detected in 57 diagnostic samples (22.4%), whereas 64 mutations were detected in 39 of the follow-up samples (27.9%). Carrying any mutation at initial diagnosis was associated with worse outcomes after TKI therapy, particularly in AS/MTF genes. Patients having these mutations at initial diagnosis and treated with imatinib showed higher risks of treatment failure (hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.66; P = .0239). The adverse prognostic impact of the mutations was not clear for patients treated with second-generation TKIs. The multivariate analysis affirmed that mutations in AS/MTF genes independently serve as adverse prognostic factors for molecular response, failure-free survival, and progression risk. Additionally, there was an observable nonsignificant trend indicating a heightened risk of progression to advanced disease and worse overall survival. In conclusion, mutations in the AS/MTF genes using smMIP-based NGS can help identify patients with a potential risk of both treatment failure and progression and may help upfront TKI selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.