Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38446785›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

Using Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning To Assess Patterns of Areal Change in Waterbodies across the Contiguous United States.

Heather L Wander, Mary Jade Farruggia, Sofia La Fuente, Maartje C Korver, Rosaura J Chapina, Jenna Robinson, Abdou Bah, Elias Munthali, Rahul Ghosh, Jemma Stachelek and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Heather L WanderVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-6045
Mary Jade FarruggiaUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States.
Sofia La FuenteDundalk Institute of Technology, Dundalk A91 K584, Ireland.
Maartje C KorverMcGill University, Montréal, Quebec H3A 0B9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1062-4864
Rosaura J ChapinaUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States.
Jenna RobinsonRensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, United States.
Abdou BahCity University of New York, New York, New York 10031, United States.
Elias MunthaliNorthern Region Water Board, Bloemwater Street, Mzuzu 105206, Malawi.
Rahul GhoshUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Jemma StachelekLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 15672, United States.
Ankush KhandelwalUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Paul C HansonUniversity of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States.
Kathleen C WeathersCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York 12545, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lake and reservoir surface areas are an important proxy for freshwater availability. Advancements in machine learning (ML) techniques and increased accessibility of remote sensing data products have enabled the analysis of waterbody surface area dynamics on broad spatial scales. However, interpreting the ML results remains a challenge. While ML provides important tools for identifying patterns, the resultant models do not include mechanisms. Thus, the "black-box" nature of ML techniques often lacks ecological meaning. Using ML, we characterized temporal patterns in lake and reservoir surface area change from 1984 to 2016 for 103,930 waterbodies in the contiguous United States. We then employed knowledge-guided machine learning (KGML) to classify all waterbodies into seven ecologically interpretable groups representing distinct patterns of surface area change over time. Many waterbodies were classified as having "no change" (43%), whereas the remaining 57% of waterbodies fell into other groups representing both linear and nonlinear patterns. This analysis demonstrates the potential of KGML not only for identifying ecologically relevant patterns of change across time but also for unraveling complex processes that underpin those changes.

Indexed as

LakesMachine LearningUnited Statesdomain knowledgeKGMLK-means clusteringlimnologymachine learningsurface areatemporal change

Identifiers

PMID38446785
PMCPMC10956424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.