Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38446769›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The queen bee phenomenon in Canadian surgical subspecialties: An evaluation of gender biases in the resident training environment.

Lydia Goff, Helena Greene, Alexandra Munn, Andrew Furey, Nicholas Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gender Distribution in Paediatric Cardiology Training Programs in Canada.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lydia GoffDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7312-9556
Helena GreeneDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-6584
Alexandra MunnDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Andrew FureyDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Nicholas SmithDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe queen bee phenomenon (QBP) describes the behavioural response that occurs when women achieve success in a male-dominated environment, and in this position of authority, treat their female subordinates more critically. It has been demonstrated in business, academia, the military, and police force. The goal of this study was to determine whether the QBP occurs in surgical specialties. We hypothesized that female surgeons, fellows, and senior surgical residents would be more critical in their assessment of junior female residents than their male counterparts.

methodsA scenario-based survey was distributed via email to all Canadian surgical programs between February and March 2021. Scenarios were designed to assess either female or male learners. Centers distributed surveys to attending surgeons, surgical fellows, resident physicians, and affiliate surgeons. Respondents average Likert score for female-based and male-based questions were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on gender, age, seniority, and surgical specialty.

results716 survey responses were collected, with 387 respondents identifying as male (54%) and 321 identifying as female (45%). 385 attending surgeons (54%), 66 fellows (9%), and 263 residents (37%) responded. The mean Likert scores for female respondents assessing female learners was significantly lower than male learners (p = 0·008, CI = 95%). During subgroup analysis, some specialties demonstrated significant scoring differences. DISCUSSION: The QBP was shown to be present among surgical specialties. Female respondents assessed female learners more critically than their male counterparts.

conclusionThese findings highlight the importance of tackling organizational biases to create more equitable educational and work environment in surgery.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSpecialties, SurgicalAnimalsBeesCanadaCommerceEducational StatusFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID38446769
PMCPMC10917252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.