Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38446504›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Real-World Data Quality Framework for Oncology Time to Treatment Discontinuation Use Case: Implementation and Evaluation Study.

Boshu Ru, Arthur Sillah, Kaushal Desai, Sheenu Chandwani, Lixia Yao, Smita Kothari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Boshu RuCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9620-1306
Arthur SillahCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1065-6735
Kaushal DesaiCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8941-2858
Sheenu ChandwaniCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-5750
Lixia YaoCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-6120
Smita KothariCenter for Observational and Real-world Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5614-3332
United States Military Academy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of real-world evidence is widely recognized in observational oncology studies. However, the lack of interoperable data quality standards in the fragmented health information technology landscape represents an important challenge. Therefore, adopting validated systematic methods for evaluating data quality is important for oncology outcomes research leveraging real-world data (RWD).

objectiveThis study aims to implement real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD) for a systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) as a new use case for the Use Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment, a framework linking data quality and relevance in fit-for-purpose RWD assessment.

methodsTo define the rwTTD use case, we mapped the operational definition of rwTTD to RWD elements commonly available from oncology electronic health record-derived data sets. We identified 20 tasks to check the completeness and plausibility of data elements concerning SACT use, line of therapy (LOT), death date, and length of follow-up. Using descriptive statistics, we illustrated how to implement the Use Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment on 2 oncology databases (Data sets A and B) to estimate the rwTTD of an SACT drug (target SACT) for patients with advanced head and neck cancer diagnosed on or after January 1, 2015.

resultsA total of 1200 (24.96%) of 4808 patients in Data set A and 237 (5.92%) of 4003 patients in Data set B received the target SACT, suggesting better relevance of the former in estimating the rwTTD of the target SACT. The 2 data sets differed with regard to the terminology used for SACT drugs, LOT format, and target SACT LOT distribution over time. Data set B appeared to have less complete SACT records, longer lags in incorporating the latest data, and incomplete mortality data, suggesting a lack of fitness for estimating rwTTD.

conclusionsThe fit-for-purpose data quality assessment demonstrated substantial variability in the quality of the 2 real-world data sets. The data quality specifications applied for rwTTD estimation can be expanded to support a broad spectrum of oncology use cases.

Indexed as

data quality assessmentreal-world datareal-world time to treatment discontinuationsystemic anticancer therapyUReQA frameworkUse Case Specific Relevance and Quality Assessment

Identifiers

PMID38446504
PMCPMC10955397
OpenAlexW4392505897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.